You get the feeling that Apple Inc. and U.S. District Judge Denise Cote did not exchange holiday greeting cards last year. As Christmas approached, the tech giant and the judge, who sits in Manhattan, were butting heads in the wake of Cote’s finding in July that Apple had illegally fixed e-book prices.
The focus of their dispute in December was Michael Bromwich of Goodwin Procter, who is the monitor Cote appointed to ensure that Apple complies with antitrust laws while the company awaits her ruling on damages. In its court papers, Apple sought to freeze Bromwich’s activities pending a decision on its appeal of her verdict to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
