A restaurant on the Upper East Side of Manhattan recently received a rather unwelcome order from a National Labor Relations Board administrative law judge. T he judge ruled in favor of a waiter who claimed he was fired in retaliation for a lawsuit he filed alleging the restaurant violated overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
The ALJ in the New York branch office of the NLRB determined that in the 200 East 81st Street Restaurant Corp. case, the waiter, Marjan Arsovski, qualified for Section 7 protections under the National Labor Relations Act, deeming his lawsuit to be “protected concerted activity.” The strange part is, although the FLSA suit was a class action, and there was a possibility of other employees opting in, Arsovski was the only person involved in the suit as a plaintiff when it was filed, and he didn’t act in concert with other restaurant workers to file it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
