Employer arbitration agreements have been in the news recently, but here’s one you may not have seen coming, for simplicity’s sake alone: “Court requires proof employees signed arbitration agreement to compel arbitration.” This comes from Foley & Lardner’s Rebecca Hanson, who writes about a recent federal court decision on the Labor and Employment Law Perspectives blog.
“Employers cannot rely on general policies requiring employees to sign such agreements to compel arbitration if the employees have not actually signed them,” says Hanson. She explains that in the case at hand, the company could not locate the signed arbitration forms of certain employees in a class. Though the company argued the employees must have signed them at one point, since it was company policy, the judge held the Federal Arbitration Act requires the employer to demonstrate there’s a written agreement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
