The “merger wave” in the pharmaceutical industry is underscoring the need to be able to interact with the antitrust regulators at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) effectively and efficiently in order to maximize the chances of obtaining Hart–Scott–Rodino (HSR) clearance quickly. Wave or no wave, merging parties typically wish to secure antitrust clearance as soon as possible to realize the associated synergies and commercial momentum, or to increase the certainty associated with a potential transaction if the target is “in-play.” But the large number of transactions in the industry today underscores the need for speedy clearance so that companies can stay ahead or keep apace of their peers and maximize shareholder benefits. FTC regulators specializing in the pharmaceutical industry have become, and likely will continue to be for the foreseeable future, extremely busy. As a result, developing an efficient strategy to deal with the FTC and other antitrust agencies reviewing pharmaceutical transactions has never been more important for companies.
The guidelines below focus on the common scenario in which the goal is to maximize the chances of obtaining FTC clearance or reducing the scope of a so-called “Second Request” of a pharmaceutical transaction during the initial HSR waiting period.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]