There’s something about the idea of dealing with unions that just plain intimidates investors. Maybe it’s from watching “On the Waterfront” one too many times. Both financial and strategic investors often instinctively reject the idea of acquiring unionized companies. This can be a mistake. Although companies with unions may have higher operating costs and other challenges, buyers should not reflexively write them off as acquisition candidates. Healthy, unionized enterprises can turn out to be excellent investments — often better than the nonunion businesses that initially seem like the better deal. The key is analyzing them correctly.
When considering the acquisition of a unionized business, it’s essential to know what should not drive the acquisition decision. Prior experiences from projects involving unionized companies, negative anecdotes from peers, or horror stories in the press should not be the deciding factor on whether to further investigate a unionized opportunity. Instead, buyer’s counsel should consider each opportunity logically, rationally and systematically, regardless of the nature of the deal or the client’s role in it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
