As careful observers of the compliance field may have noted, the profession has spent more than a decade working to define itself. This has meant dispelling a number of persistent and dangerous myths that gave rise to a legacy Compliance 1.0 model (Compliance as a captive arm of Legal), which itself can be found at the roots of many of the big compliance train wrecks that litter the corporate landscape. It’s not too hard to understand the flawed reasoning that created Compliance 1.0 in the early days of the evolving profession:
• “If it involves legal risks, it must be a subset of Legal”; which then led to
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
