Plaintiffs’ attorneys pursuing a class action against Uber Technologies Inc. have asked the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to overturn a panel decision that they say “creates a new level of insulation” for arbitration agreements.
In a petition for rehearing en banc, lawyers at Ahdoot & Wolfson and Goldstein, Borgen, Dardarian & Ho argue that last month’s opinion sending driver disputes into arbitration runs counter to Ninth Circuit jurisprudence as well as rules established by the Supreme Court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
