Banks, insurance companies, patent licensing shops and computer makers battled over Section 101 of the Patent Act, not at the D.C.-based courthouse, but before several hundred law students as the judges held court at six different Southern California law schools.
Patent holders such as Intellectual Ventures Management and DataTreasury Corp. argued that they’re claiming genuine technological advances worthy of protection, while companies such as Capital One Financial Corp. and Fidelity National Information Services Inc. accused them of using broad, generically worded patents to unfairly extract licensing fees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
