A lawyer for four former employees of Chinese ride-hailing app company UCAR Inc. is crying foul over how the company obtained a court order barring them from working on any project based on company trade secrets.
Claude Stern of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan wrote in a court filing Thursday that UCAR’s counsel at RuyakCherian incorrectly informed U.S. District Judge Edward Davila that the defendants were properly put on notice that the company was seeking a temporary restraining order as part of a trade secret case filed on Tuesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
