One of the most important cases facing general counsel, their accountants and outside lawyers has been percolating through Texas. The suit raises questions about the scope of the so-called auditor privilege — whether records turned over to auditors, including sensitive legal documents, are for the auditor’s eyes only, or whether they can be subpoenaed by third parties.

It didn’t look like a particularly consequential case at the outset. It began as a dispute between two companies over a construction contract. In 2002 AES Wolf Hollow commissioned The Shaw Group Inc. to build an electric power plant in Texas for $99 million. But things got ugly, and Shaw eventually sued AES for nonpayment. In turn, AES said that since Shaw was suing for lost profits and damages, it had a right to see the company’s financials. So AES subpoenaed the accounting firm Ernst & Young for Shaw’s auditing records. Granbury, Texas-based AES made the request even though Shaw and its auditor are located in Louisiana, where state law provides for an iron-clad auditor-client privilege.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]