Five months before a second-year associate searched a Qualcomm witness’s laptop during trial and found important e-mails that had not been turned over as discovery, the company’s senior outside lawyers had already received a hint that such e-mails may have existed, according to the attorneys’ declarations filed last week.
Yet the lawyers at Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder did not search the witness’ laptop for evidence.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
