Survey: Law Departments' Legal Spend Stabilizing
Many departments also told HBR Consulting they have added in-house lawyers and other legal staff.
November 15, 2017 at 01:03 PM
3 minute read
Law departments bulked up staff numbers this past year, while total legal spending began to stabilize, according to a new survey.
HBR Consulting's 2017 Law Department Survey, released this week, indicates that there was a zero percent change in total legal spending year over year between 2016 and 2017.
The survey from the consultancy for legal organizations and corporations is in its 14th year and includes data from almost 300 participants, primarily from Fortune 500 level companies.
Median legal spend internally increased by 4 percent this year, up 1 percent over the previous year's results. Meanwhile, median outside counsel spend saw zero change from the year prior. Last year's survey showed a 2 percent median decrease in outside counsel spending.
“For the past several years, law departments have continued to be cost-conscious, particularly when it comes to outside counsel,” said Lauren Chung, HBR Consulting's managing director and the editor of the survey. “This year it was a tremendous effort by law departments to keep outside counsel spend steady, because outside counsel rates are increasing. They're still using outside counsel, but the way they're using them continues to evolve.”
Forty-three percent of departments reported to have increased their total number of lawyers, and the same number reported an increase in total legal staff, including nonlawyers. Twenty-five percent reported no change, and 32 percent reported a decrease in staffing.
The majority of departments (58 percent) expect to maintain the same number of attorneys next year. Thirty-one percent expect attorney staffing to increase, and only 11 percent anticipate a decrease in staffing.
“This data is consistent with what we're seeing in the market that departments are investing internally and they are effective in controlling costs,” Chung said.
Respondents from the survey reported a median revenue of $10.7 billion for their companies, and the median total legal spend was $32.5 million.
On average, in-house lawyers reported total annual compensation—including salary, cash bonus and long-term incentives—of $321,000, up 3.5 percent from the previous year. This includes lawyers at all levels, including CLOs and GCs. The median total compensation was $282,000, up 1.4 percent from 2016.
Most areas of compensation have grown compared to last year, except for bonuses. Most survey respondents stated that bonuses were tied to company performance, which is the most likely reason this pay component was down, Chung said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Gives Legal Departments New Leverage to Demand Speed, Efficiency From Law Firms
3 minute readTexas' Highest-Paid GCs: Companies New to State Snag Top Spots
Microsoft's Banner Year Pushed Brad Smith's Pay Sharply Higher
Cisco CLO's Comp Surges in Year Marked by Huge Acquisition, Declining Sales
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250