Trucker Gets $425,000 Verdict for Wrongful Termination
The driver claimed he was fired after refusing to haul a load that exceeded federal weight limits.
June 02, 2017 at 04:06 PM
3 minute read
A trucker who claimed his supervisors illegally fired him for refusing to haul a load exceeding the federal weight limit was awarded a $436,900 jury verdict.
The eight-person jury handed down its decision Wednesday in favor of driver Michael Kennedy. Most of the $425,000 verdict was for punitive damages, meaning the award will be reduced since the Surface Transportation Assistance Act limits punitive damages to $250,000. The jury also awarded $11,900 in noneconomic and economic damages.
Kennedy, one of the more experienced drivers for the Harwinton-based Supreme Forest Products Inc. and Supreme Industries Inc., claimed he was fired for twice refusing to drive his truck with more than 80,000 pounds of gross vehicle weight. Kennedy said the companies violated provisions of STAA and sued them in U.S. District Court in December 2014.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Will Happen to U.S. Efforts Against Financial Secrecy and Corruption Under Trump’s Leadership?
4 minute readEnzo BioChem Settles With NJ, Other States for $4.5M Over Health Data Breach
4 minute readShareholder Suit Alleges Meta, Zuckerberg Kept Status Quo Despite Increase in Online Child Sexual Predators
JetBlue-Spirit Airlines Planned $3.8 Billion Merger Dropped Due to Antitrust Concerns
Trending Stories
- 1Akin Promotes Record Number of Lawyers to Partner
- 2Ogletree Deakins Names 5 New Office Managing Shareholders
- 3Six Judges Take Up New Leadership Roles in NYC Courts
- 4Carlos Ortiz Retiring After 35-Year Run as GC of Goya Foods
- 5'There's a Ticking Clock in This Case': Giuliani Held in Contempt in Defamation Enforcement Litigation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250