Equifax Hit With Another Class Action Over Breach
West Haven resident Natalie Quagliani filed the suit in the wake of a massive data breach that affected millions of Americans.
October 05, 2017 at 02:48 PM
3 minute read
Equifax has been hit with another prospective class action lawsuit—this time in Connecticut—by a woman who claims the company's massive data breach is an invasion of privacy that could lead to identity theft.
West Haven resident Natalie Quagliani filed the suit, one of at least 23 class actions filed against the credit-reporting giant nationwide, in U.S. District Court in Connecticut Tuesday. Court records show that the cyberattack, which occurred from May to late July, provided unauthorized access to personal information, including Social Security numbers, for nearly 44 percent of the population, or about 143 million people.
The prospective class action is for Connecticut residents only.
In the suit, Quagliani said she was told by Equifax that she's likely a victim of the breach.
“Quagliani and the Class have suffered significant economic damage in that they will almost certainly be required to incur significant costs for the rest of their respective lives,” according to the lawsuit. Those costs includes purchasing credit monetary services or credit repair services from third-party providers.
The lawsuit claims Atlanta-based Equifax was aware of security holes in its cyber defense as early as March. Equifax data was hacked in mid-May and again in July, but the company did not publicly report the breaches until Sept. 7.
“It is deeply troubling that apparently Equifax was seemingly motivated to drag its heels notifying consumers,” the lawsuit continues.
Equifax is accused of willful violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act; negligent violation of the FCRA; violation of the Connecticut General Statutes related to the protection of Social Security numbers; failure to provide timely notification of data breach as required by state statutes; unfair trade practices in violation of state statutes; and common-law negligence.
The lawsuit seeks class action status to seek compensatory, punitive, and statutory damages, and attorney fees. The lawsuit also seeks to force Equifax to provide free credit monitoring or free credit repair services.
Quagliani is represented by partners Steven Moore and James Nealon of Withers Bergman in Old Greenwich. Neither Moore nor Nealon responded to a request for comment Thursday.
An Equifax representative said: “We cannot comment on pending litigation, but want to reassure consumers that we are remaining focused on helping them to navigate this situation and providing the best customer support possible. We are listening to issues consumers have experienced and their suggestions, which are helping to further inform our actions as we continue to improve this process.”
The case will be heard in front of Judge Stefan Underhill.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250