Connecticut Hospitals Sue Anthem Over New Reimbursement Arrangement
After it turned down a three-year contract agreement with Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Hartford HealthCare Corporation alleges Anthem retaliated by refusing to pay HHC directly for emergency care. Instead, the new policy calls on patients to get reimbursed and then make arrangements to pay HHC.
October 06, 2017 at 05:24 PM
3 minute read
A group of Connecticut hospitals has sued Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield claiming the insurer is refusing to pay them directly for medically necessary emergency care in retaliation for not signing a new provider agreement.
Anthem told Hartford HealthCare Corp. that it will only pay patients directly. The patients then have to pay the hospital. HHC, which represents six state hospitals, said Anthem changed its payment policy after failing to reach a last-minute agreement on a three-year contract in September. HHC said it rejected Anthem's last contract offer because it contained “unfairly low reimbursement rates.”
The federal lawsuit filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Connecticut seeks an injunction forcing Anthem to pay HHC instead.
The lawsuit claims Anthem paid HHC directly for emergency care for decades, and that the new policy puts ”an unfair and substantial burden on both the affected patients and Hartford HealthCare.”
The patient, HHC said, “will have the burden of collecting those checks, cashing them, and making arrangements to pay Hartford HealthCare themselves. This process is time-consuming, and fraught with risk of lost checks, mispayments, and other issues.”
The new policy brings ”significant administrative burdens” for the hospitals, according to the lawsuit. That includes waiting to receive the reimbursement from the patients and follow-up efforts tracking down delayed, misplaced, lost and wrongly cashed checks.
HHC said Anthem hasn't explained the change in payment policy, and that the insurer's actions violate state and federal law, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
The lawsuit claims the ACA requires Anthem to pay HHC directly for necessary emergency medical services. Connecticut General Statute §38a-477aa(b)(3)(A) requires insurers to pay health care providers directly for emergency services provided out-of-network.
Anthem no longer has a participating provider agreement with HHC, which was forced to become an out-of-network provider, according to the lawsuit.
In addition to the injunction forcing Anthem to pay HHC directly, HHC is seeking a declaration that Anthem's actions violate the ACA and Connecticut law, and attorney fees.
The involved hospitals are Hartford Hospital, The Hospital of Central Connecticut at New Britain General, Bradley Memorial, Midstate Medical Center, The William Backus Hospital and Windham Community Memorial Hospital.
Sarah Yeager, director of communications for the Wallingford-based Anthem, did not respond to a request for comment Friday.
Roy Breitenbach, an attorney with Garfunkel Wild in Stamford, represents HHC. He also did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMall of America Dealt Another Blow in Quest to End $10-Per-Year Lease With Sears
3 minute readJudge Awards $48.6 Million to Frontier Airlines in COVID-19 Breach of Contract Suit
With Employment Law in National Spotlight, Contractor Scores in Trade Secrets Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Meet Delaware's Incoming Lt. Gov.: 'It's a Natural Progression' From Litigation to Policy
- 2Class Action Settlements Totaled $40B+ Three Years in a Row: 'We’re in a New Era'
- 3Automaker Pleads Guilty and Agrees to $1.6 Billion in Payouts
- 4MLB's Texas Rangers Search For a New GC and a Broadcasting Deal
- 5Does the Treasury Hack Underscore a Big Problem for the Private Sector?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250