Discrimination Lawsuit Against Yale Proceeds
Former Yale employee Leon McCalla alleges in a lawsuit that he was harassed and verbally assaulted because he is an African-American.
October 27, 2017 at 02:41 PM
3 minute read
Yale University.
Yale University scored a partial victory Thursday when a U.S. district court judge threw out one of seven counts leveled by a former employee who claimed racial discrimination and harassment by his supervisor.
In tossing Leon McCalla's claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, U.S. District Judge Janet Hall said the plaintiff failed to show the alleged conduct against him met the high bar of his claim.
“The court agrees that the facts alleged by McCalla do not rise to the level of extreme and outrageous and count seven is dismissed on this ground,” Hall wrote.
The litigation continues and the next step in the case are for depositions to be conducted.
McCalla, who worked as a lab technician at the university's Animal Resources Center, said he was belittled, micromanaged and repeatedly put down by Melissa Bonk, his supervisor since May 2013. A lawsuit citing violations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was filed June 23.
McCalla, one of the three African-American lab technicians, said the minority lab technicians had been “reprimanded, either verbally or written,” by Bonk, who is white. McCalla, who had worked for Yale since 1989, alleged the nine white technicians were not reprimanded for the same infractions that their African-American counterparts were.
One example, McCalla said, occurred in March 2016.
“Ms. Bonk again berated, ridiculed and insulted plaintiff, for pointing out a scheduling error that Scott Wilson, his backup scheduler made.” Wilson, who is white, was not ridiculed or disciplined, the suit said.
The suit also alleges the African-American workers were written up for coming into work late, when the same rule didn't apply to their white counterparts. Specifically, the suit states, Wilson “was not written up for arriving to work late on a routine basis.”
Bonk allegedly made McCalla's work environment unbearable by degrading him in front of others after he filed several complaints against her. On the advice of his doctor, McCalla was discharged from Yale in August 2016. McCalla, the suit states, “could no longer tolerate Yale's hostile work environment.”
The lawsuit has six remaining counts: discrimination based on race and nationality, a violation of Title VII; retaliation based upon race and nationality, a violation of Title VII; race and nationality discrimination, a violation of Connecticut general statutes; race and nationality discrimination, retaliation in violation of Connecticut general statutes; hostile work environment, a violation of Title VII; and hostile work environment based upon race and national discrimination, a violation of Connecticut general statutes.
The lawsuit seeks punitive damages, pre-judgment interest; and attorney fees. McCalla is seeking a jury trial.
Kevin Shea, partner with Clendenen & Shea in New Haven, represents Yale.
“Our next step is to proceed with discovery on the remaining counts.” Shea said Friday. “The other counts may or may not have factual disputes that we do not know about until we proceed with discovery. The university is defending these claims.” Shea did not elaborate.
McCalla is represented by Eugene Axelrod, owner, and Michael McMinn, associate, both with Axelrod & Associates in Woodbridge. Neither attorney responded to a request for comment Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readFederal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250