Dignity for Incarcerated Women Act Benefits Us All
The “Dignity for Incarcerated Women Act of 2017” (Dignity Act), which improves the treatment of federal prisoners who are primary caretaker parents,…
October 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM
5 minute read
The “Dignity for Incarcerated Women Act of 2017” (Dignity Act), which improves the treatment of federal prisoners who are primary caretaker parents, particularly women, is a much-needed, long overdue federal prison reform bill.
Until 2016, there has been little research on or attention given to the specific needs of incarcerated women. In the national dialogue concerning prison reform, virtually all research and all new reforms and programs that address the growing jail populations in the U.S., such as assessment tools, pretrial supervision and probation programs, are based on men's experience in jail. Understanding and addressing women's needs is particularly important because the increase of women being jailed in the U.S. has far exceeded the increase of male prisoners, and the existing system has failed to meet their needs.
A 2016 study by Vera Institute of Justice focused on women in prison. Since 1980, the number of women in U.S. jails has increased by more than 700 percent, which is much greater than that of men. Studies show women enter the prison system in a more vulnerable and disadvantaged position than men. Women are more economically disadvantaged in general than men and are less likely to be able to afford the bail, fines and fees that often trap them in jail or lead them back to jail following their release. Like their male counterparts, the majority of women in jail are black and Hispanic. Unlike men, however, nearly half of all single black and Hispanic American women have zero or negative net wealth. A greater percentage of women are using drugs, unemployed or receiving public assistance at the time of arrest.
Unlike men, the majority of women in jail are charged with lower-level offenses, mostly nonviolent property and drug-related crimes, and “public order” offenses that include prostitution. According to the report, 86 percent of women in jail are victims of past sexual violence, which is about four times the rate of all women in the U.S., and 77 percent are victims of partner violence. Other studies showed that a quarter of women in state prison were sexually abused as children. While incarcerated, women remain at a disadvantage for sexual abuse. They constitute most of the victims of staff-on-inmate sexual assault. Almost half of women in jail suffer from mental health problems. Approximately one-third of all women in jail have a serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or major depression, more than twice the rate for incarcerated men and about six times more than women in general.
Nearly eight out of 10 of female prisoners are mothers, most with children under age 18. Unlike their male counterparts, the majority of these women are single parents. In the federal system, incarcerated women can be shipped hundreds of miles away from their children. It is not uncommon for incarcerated mothers to be forced to choose between using any money they have to call home to speak with their children and buying necessities, such as sanitary products.
The Dignity Act requires the Bureau of Prisons, among other things, to place a prisoner who has children in a prison as close to the children as possible, to expand visitation rights between primary caregiver parents and their families, including no less than six visits per week with as many as five adult visits and an unlimited number of children per visit and permits physical contact with those visitors. The act prohibits BOP from placing a pregnant prisoner (or one in post-partum recovery) in segregated housing and from shackling or restraining them. It directs BOP to provide trauma-informed care and officers trained to identify prisoners with trauma and make proper referrals and requires certain health care products to be available at no cost, including tampons, sanitary napkins, soap, shampoo, body lotion, toothpaste and toothbrushes. It also prohibits officers from conducting a strip search of an opposite-sex prisoner or entering a restroom reserved for the opposite-sex prisoners.
Connecticut has been a leader in prison reform and Gov. Dannel Malloy's initiatives have helped curb incarceration. Since 2011, there are fewer prisoners and fewer prisons in Connecticut. The state's male prison population has decreased by about 20 percent, but the female prisoner population has declined by only 7 percent.
Connecticut also has its own problems with meeting the needs of incarcerated women. For example, in 2016, women inmates at York, which is the only women's prison operated by the state, were more likely than men at other facilities to be unsentenced. In 2015, 36 percent of the women at York were detained but unsentenced, compared with 24 percent of men at all other facilities. One in six women at York were held for violations of probation or some other form of conditional discharge, as compared to one in nine men. One study concluded the median bond amount for violation of probation for women is about $25,250 and for possession of narcotics it is $20,000. Twenty-five percent of women charged with possession face a bond of more than $75,000. Many Connecticut simply women do not have the money to be released on bond.
Understanding the specific needs of female prisoners leads to more effective alternatives that build better futures for women and their families. Addressing those needs allows female prisoners and their families to be treated with dignity and basic support. The Dignity Act is a critical step toward addressing the needs of women federal prisoners, reducing recidivism and increasing community safety. Of note, BOP recently decided to provide sanitary products to female inmates free of charge, implementing one of the reforms outlined in the Dignity Act. Connecticut should continue to be a leader in prison reform and specifically in understanding and addressing the needs of female state prisoners.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readBig Law Practice Leaders Gearing Up for State AG Litigation Under Trump
4 minute readA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bar Report - Jan. 27
- 2Cornell Claims AT&T, Verizon Violated the University's Wi-Fi Patents
- 3OCR Issues 'Dear Colleagues' Letter Regarding AI in Medicine
- 4Corporate Litigator Joins BakerHostetler From Fish & Richardson
- 5E-Discovery Provider Casepoint Merges With Government Software Company OPEXUS
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250