Family of Man Who Died in Fall From Hotel Balcony Sues for Negligence
The estate of Alonzo Depina has sued Foxwoods Resorts Casino claiming the casino should held liable for his drunken fall from a hotel room at the gaming facility.
November 08, 2017 at 12:31 PM
4 minute read
Attorneys for the estate of a Rhode Island man who climbed over a railing and fell from the 14th floor of a casino hotel balcony while drunk have filed a lawsuit in Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Court claiming the gaming facility was negligent.
Alonzo Depina, a guest at Foxwoods Resort Casino, accidentally fell from a ledge on his room's balcony in October 2016, according to James Harrington, attorney for the estate. The balcony had a railing with an unprotected ledge about a foot wide on the other side.
Harrington said police concluded that Depina climbed over the railing and was walking along the ledge when he accidentally fell.
A wrongful death lawsuit was filed Oct. 3. Both parties made their first appearances in tribal court within the past two weeks.
At issue, Harrington said, is whether Foxwoods staff should have given a key to the balcony to someone who was clearly drunk.
Harrington, an associate with Polito & Associates in Waterford, said casino staff were culpable in Depina's death because they granted a request to unlock the balcony at the Grand Pequot Hotel.
Foxwoods has a key to each room's balcony, which guests must ask a hotel employee to unlock. In this case, either Depina or one of his three suite mates asked an employee to unlock the balcony, Harrington said. All four individuals were intoxicated and hotel staff shouldn't have opened the balcony, Harrington said.
Harrington said he didn't know why Depina climbed out onto the ledge.
The group was denied service at a hotel bar because they were visibly drunk, Harrington said.
“You have a group of people who have been identified by the hotel prior as being intoxicated,” Harrington said. “Allowing them access to the balcony while drunk, we believe, has certain dangers.”
Depina, 22, was with a party of about 10 people who left on a bus from the restaurant they worked at in South Kingston, Rhode Island, across the border to Foxwoods in Ledyard, Connecticut.
Depina and his friends were drinking on the bus ride to the casino and arrived drunk, Harrington said. Their first stop at Foxwoods was at the hotel bowling alley.
“Initially, they were not allowed to have liquor at the casino because they were intoxicated,” Harrington said. “However, for reasons currently unknown, the group was eventually allowed to consume alcohol.”
The coroner classified Depina's death as an accidental fall.
Even though Depina was drunk and of age, Harrington said blame for his death needs to be placed on the hotel.
“We are claiming negligence because he got the key to the balcony from hotel staff. The balcony has a railing and ledge that make access to it very easy,” he said.
Harrington would not say whether Depina should share responsibility for his actions that night, saying, “That is a question for the court to address. There is no questions that his intoxication is part of the case and what is driving this case.”
Harrington said the incident at Foxwoods “is similar to the responsibility we hold bars to. If you overserve someone in a bar context, you have a responsibility not to allow them to get into a car. Here, they should not have allowed them to have that key.”
The case will be heard in Tribal Court in front of Edward O'Connell Jr., of Waller Smith & Palmer in New London. The tribe hires attorneys to work per diem as independent tribal judges, Harrington said.
Harrington said the next step is to gather internal reports from the hotel on the accidentm as well as any surveillance video. Harrington said the trial is tentatively set for Dec. 13, 2018.
The casino is represented by Ed Gasser, a solo practitioner from Avon. Gasser did not respond to repeated requests for comment. No one from the Mashantucket Pequot Public Affairs Department responded to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readFederal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250