Former Investment Partner Awarded Millions for Breach of Contract
A six-person jury last week found that William Lomas' former business partners breached a contract with him when he gave notice to leave the firm. He has been awarded $4.1 million
November 12, 2017 at 01:32 PM
3 minute read
A Stamford Superior Court jury has awarded the former treasurer of an investment advisory firm $4.15 million plus interest and fees for not meeting a contractual obligation to buy him out after he gave notice he was leaving the firm.
Following more than five weeks at trial, a six-person jury handed down the verdict Nov. 3, finding Westport-based Partner Wealth Management and three of its members were obligated to buy out William Lomas' 25-percent share of the company upon his departure in 2014. When Kevin Burns, James Pratt-Heaney and William Loftus failed to buy him out, Lomas sued. An amended suit was filed in December 2015.
The total amount of the award—with six percent interest plus attorney fees—is expected to total between $7 and $8 million, according to Thomas Rechen, one of Lomas' attorneys. The defense has until Nov. 17 to file post-trial motions, which could lead to an appeal in Appellate Court.
“He was entitled to have his equity interest,” said Rechen, a partner with McCarter & English in Hartford. “There were a plethora of emails that showed they were searching for a way to get out from under this obligation, and they ultimately concluded that the way to do this was to amend the agreement after he gave notice.”
Rechen said the firm and its three remaining members “reduced the obligation by a little more than $1 million, but they did not pay him that either.” In addition to breach of contract, the defendants were accused of willful and wanton misconduct.
Partner Wealth Management was founded in 2009 when the four men left Merrill Lynch's Westport offices start their own investment business, handling accounts for wealthy investors in the region.
In October 2014, Lomas, now 59, gave notice that he would be leaving the company in January 2015. Rechen said evidence at trial showed Lomas and his fellow partners did not see eye to eye on the future of the firm.
After deliberating for a day and a half, the jury found in favor of Lomas on all counts.
“They made a counter-claim that Mr. Lomas committed fraud and that he breached his fiduciary duty,” Rechen said Friday. “They also said he did not perform his work as a member or partner like he should have. They also claimed he delayed important decisions for the firm and failed in the execution of important decisions for the firm.” The jury disagreed and “found for us across the board.”
Rechen said his client “feels vindicated, first and foremost. He always believed he was right in what he was entitled to under the 2009 contract. He also feels vindicated that the jury gave no credence to the counter claims filed against him.”
The attorney added that he is confident the owed money will be collected. “We believe the money will be there. These are guys that manage the money of very wealthy people and they have done very well in their business,” Rechen said. “We believe that, at the end of the day, there will be available assets to pay my client.”
The firm and its three other members are represented by two attorneys: Tom O'Dea, of Diserio Martin O'Connor & Castiglioni in Stamford and Gerard Fox of the Gerard Fox Law Firm in Los Angeles. Both men declined comment Friday.
Assisting Rechen on the case were Brittany Kilian, James Regan, Shawn Smith, Ben Elliott and Charles Ray.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Upholds $5M Judgment Against Trump in E. Jean Carroll Case
4 minute readArt of the Settlement: Trump Attorney Reveals Strategy in ABC Lawsuit
Trending Stories
- 1Big Company Insiders See Technology-Related Disputes Teed Up for 2025
- 2Attorney Fee Reimbursement for Non-Party Subpoena Recipients under CPLR 3122(d)
- 3‘Second’ Time’s a Charm? The Second Circuit Reaffirms the Contours of the Special Interest Beneficiary Standing Rule
- 4Lobbying-Focused Brownstein Hyatt Opens 13th Office in Tampa
- 5Amid Race for Top Talent, Latham Focuses on Lateral Integration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250