Wells Fargo Report Shows Legal Market Stalled in Third Quarter
Through the first six months of this year, 2017 was shaping up to be a strong one for law firms. The same cannot be said following poor third-quarter results touted this week by two leading law firm lenders.
November 16, 2017 at 06:13 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
The legal market took a turn for the worse in the third quarter of the year, according to a report released Thursday by Wells Fargo & Co., which backed up a similar report from earlier this week by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
Year-over-year growth in revenue, demand for billable hours and revenue per lawyer all slipped in the third quarter after a relatively strong first half of the year, said the survey of 135 firms done by Wells Fargo Private Bank's Legal Specialty Group.
Revenue grew 3.7 percent year-to-date through three quarters, which was down from 4.8 percent growth through the first half of 2017, Wells Fargo said. Demand for billable hours grew slightly at 1.4 percent through nine months, compared to 1.6 percent through six months. Revenue per lawyer through nine months had grown 2.3 percent; compared to 3.2 percent through six months.
The largest firms continued to outperform their smaller peers. The Am Law 100 saw larger growth than Am Law Second Hundred firms in revenue (4.4 percent versus 1 percent); demand (2.2 percent versus minus 1.8 percent); and revenue per lawyer (2.6 percent versus 1.1 percent).
But those averages are starting to mean less and less as the dispersion of firm performance grows greater, said Jeff Grossman, a senior director of banking in Wells Fargo's Legal Specialty Group. The best performers are increasingly pulling up the averages.
Among Am Law 100 respondents, 46 percent of firms saw revenue growth through nine months of between 2 and 5 percent; 20 percent of firms saw revenue growth greater than 10 percent; and 5 percent of firms saw revenue fall more than 5 percent. The best individual performer saw revenue rise more than 25 percent without a merger, while the worst performer had revenue slip 14 percent. (Perhaps not surprisingly, law firm mergers were at a record pace through the third quarter of this year.)
Busier firms are also doing better at increasing their rates, Grossman said. For example, the standard rate for an Am Law 50 equity partner was up 5 percent through nine months. The average equity partner in the Am Law Second Hundred saw a rate increase of 3.2 percent.
“Their [utilization] is running over 80 hours behind and their rates aren't growing as fast,” Grossman said of the Am Law Second Hundred. “You can see the slippage.”
Citi's third-quarter report, released this week, said it is unlikely that 2017 will be as strong of a financial year as 2016 for the country's law firms. The Citi report showed striking similarity with Wells Fargo on revenue growth, reporting 3.6 percent growth through nine months this year.
Billing rate increases of 4 percent were the largest factor; outpacing the 3.2 percent growth from a year ago. Offsetting that was a dip in demand of 0.2 percent, which compared unfavorably to a 0.3 percent increase during the same period last year.
One reason for optimism: The Citi and Wells Fargo reports said inventory, or uncollected bills, had reached a high point. Citi said inventory grew 4.6 percent at the end of nine months, well ahead of a 3.1 percent increase through the same period last year. And accounts receivable growth was up 6.7 percent through nine months, compared to only 2.6 percent a year ago.
Law firms will be gearing up for another year-end collections push. But as the holiday season looms on the horizon, don't give into the eggnog quite yet.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllT14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
Wrongful-Death Case Against Adult Day Care Sparks Call for State Regulation
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250