New Britain Joins Legal Fray in Opioid Fight Against Drugmakers
The city of New Britain filed a lawsuit Thursday morning against some of the nation's largest pharmaceutical companies, claiming they've engaged in a deceptive marketing campaign to mislead the public about the dangers of prescription opioids.
December 07, 2017 at 11:13 AM
4 minute read
The city of New Britain filed a lawsuit Thursday morning against some of the nation's largest pharmaceutical companies, claiming they've engaged in a deceptive marketing campaign to mislead the public about the dangers of prescription opioids.
The lawsuit, filed in New Britain Superior Court by attorneys at Scott + Scott, comes on the heels of opioid lawsuits filed by Waterbury and New Haven. Similar lawsuits have been filed by municipalities across the nation.
All three Connecticut lawsuits claim drugmakers published misleading articles in medical journals that encouraged the use of opioids to treat chronic pain. In addition, the suits claim the manufacturers continue to sponsor medical courses that persuade doctors that opioids don't pose a serious threat of addiction.
The latest suit also notes that heroin addiction is often linked to opioid abuse, highlighting the long-term costs the industry has placed on the shoulders of Connecticut communities such as New Britain.
The lawsuit seeks compensation for New Britain's costs incurred by the opioid crisis, such as burdens placed on first responders and social services. It was not immediately clear how much those costs are.
The lawsuit claims the city spent “enormous funds in providing for rehabilitative services for its residents who have been severely damaged by the addiction.”
New Britain officials said the opioid epidemic has had a drastic effect on the Hardware City. New Britain ranks fifth in the state, with 35 deaths in 2016, for opioid-related deaths, according to the State's Office of the Chief Medical Examiner. The office said 917 people died statewide from drug overdoses in 2016, a 25 percent jump from 2015. That number includes all drugs, not just opioids.
“The abuse of opiates is the serial killer of our time,” said New Britain Police Chief James Wardwell in a press release. “I have served this city for 24 years and have never seen so much death caused by any other single source. We have dedicated more resources than ever before to fight against this devastating tide, and will continue to do all we can with our community partners to protect life.”
New Britain Mayor Erin Stewart said in a press release “these drugs have been abused beyond their original intended use and their misuse has turned into an epidemic affecting all walks of life.” The mayor noted that, according to its agreement with Scott + Scott, the firm will be entitled to attorney fees only if it wins or settles the litigation.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered all federal lawsuits brought by cities, counties and states to be transferred to a judge in Ohio.
The New Britain lawsuit targets Purdue Pharma, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Insys Therapeutics, McKesson Corp., AmerisourceBergen Corp. and Cardinal Health.
John Puskar, Purdue Pharma public affairs director, issued the Connecticut Law Tribune the same statement he did last month when it was sued by New Haven.
“We are deeply troubled by the opioid crisis and we are dedicated to being part of the solution,” the statement reads. “As a company growing in science, we must balance patient access to FDA-approved medicines, while working collaboratively to solve this public health challenge. Although our products account for approximately 2 percent of the total opioid prescriptions, as a company, we've distributed the Center for Disease Control Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain, developed the first FDA-approved opioid medication with abuse-deterrent properties and partner with law enforcement to ensure access to naloxone. We vigorously deny these allegations and look forward to the opportunity to present our defense.”
Within the past year alone, at least 25 states, cities and counties have filed civil cases against manufacturers, distributors and large drugstore chains that make up the $13 billion-a-year opioid industry. The majority of the lawsuits filed against the industry are still pending.
[falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readFederal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250