Immigration Attorney Resigns After 34 Grievance Complaints Filed Against Her
Westport attorney Judith Sporn was previously suspended for failing to adequately represent clients.
December 11, 2017 at 05:55 PM
3 minute read
A former Westport immigration attorney suspended for two years for mishandling cases for two clients, has resigned after learning there were 34 grievance complaints filed against her.
After attorney Judith Sporn was suspended in 2015, trustee Hamza Ma'Ayergi went through the status of her current cases and notified the attorney's clients she was suspended. Soon after Sporn's current cases were reviewed, the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel filed 34 grievance complaints against her. Most of those complaint involved Sporn receiving payments for work that was never completed or started.
The latest reports from the Statewide Grievance Committee shows that Sporn, a solo practitioner since 1982, subsequently resigned from the bar.
One such case was of Luis Enclada, who paid Sporn $2,685 to represent him in an immigration matter. The committee found she failed to file the paperwork or pursue the issue.
Sporn was suspended in 2015 for failing to provide adequate representation to two clients, which resulted in those clients being detained for more than a year by immigration officials. At the time, Judge Donna Heller wrote: “The respondent's failure to represent her clients competently and diligently caused them significant injury.”
At issue in 2015 were the case of Vincent Kolami and Adrian Emin who are Albanian citizens and brothers-in-law who owned a construction business and lived in Prospect, according to the committee. Kolami and Emin visited Sporn several times a month from 2003 to 2011 to discuss their immigration status, and both paid Sporn $2,500.
Emin came to the U.S. on a visitor's visa in about 2000 and applied for political asylum, which was denied in 2003. Kolami came to the U.S. at about the same time on a visitor's visa with his wife and son, and their application for political asylum was also denied in 2003. The men said Sporn informed them the paperwork was documented and had been filed.
Sporn, though, was suspended by the judge for inaction on behalf of her clients.
“At no time between August 2003 and August 2011 did (Sporn) contact the Board of Immigration Appeals to determine the status of Emin's appeal or the Kolamis' appeal,” Heller wrote at the time. “Had she done so, she would have learned that the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily dismissed the Kolamis' appeal on May 13, 2004, and dismissed Mr. Emin's appeals on the merits in 2004.”
The Connecticut Law Tribune reported at the time that Heller wrote, “They were deprived (while detained by immigration officials) of their livelihood, their families and their liberty. They were forced to incur legal expenses to retain new counsel.”
Alexander Schwartz, a solo practitioner from Southport, represents Sporn. Schwartz did not respond to a request for comment Monday.
Karyl Carrasquilla, office of the chief disciplinary counsel, declined to comment Monday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readFederal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250