Enfield Settles 9th Police Brutality Claim for $140,000
Facing a string of police brutality lawsuits involving one former officer, Enfield was under fire for not releasing the settlement amounts of eight previous cases.
December 20, 2017 at 06:23 PM
3 minute read
The town of Enfield, facing scrutiny for not releasing financial information related to a string of settled police brutality cases involving one former police officer, announced this week that it has settled a ninth and final case for $140,000.
The most recent settlement stems from allegations that police officer Matthew Worden smashed Tyler Damato's head into asphalt multiple times after responding to a call for a suicidal subject. Damato was also shocked by a stun gun twice, according to a lawsuit. Worden was responding to a call from Damato's mother, who said her son was expressing suicidal thoughts.
The lawsuit filed on behalf of Damato's estate said he suffered a prior brain injury as a result of a car accident. Damato, 20, in February 2013 suffered a second car accident two months after his encounter with Worden. His estate claimed the previous injuries caused by Worden contributed to Damato's death.
Worden was at the center of all of nine police brutality cases. He was fired in 2014, but the firing was changed to a resignation after he appealed.
The total settlement for all the cases “far exceeds $225,000,” said town attorney Christopher Bromson, who disputed published reports that said the town has paid that amount to settle the nine cases.
The exact number is still unknown because Enfield had refused to release the details of the settlement at the request of its insurer.
The eight previous settlements were the subject of a ruling by the Freedom of Information Commission, which found the town had to release the monetary damages paid out to the families. The crux of the case was whether the public had a right to the information despite claims by the town that disclosing the details could financially jeopardize it in other litigation.
Bromson said Enfield was following the recommendation of the attorneys for its former insurance carrier, Connecticut Interlocal Risk Management Agency, which feared releasing specific settlement amounts would lead to other plaintiffs wanting to get more money.
Bromson said he delivered a request to CIRMA attorney James Tallberg asking for the release of all related settlements. “I expect that information soon. The releases should be readily available,” he said.
Dan Barrett, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut, said Enfield should not have withheld the information in the first place, and accused the town of dragging its feet and playing games.
“It should not have taken this long to get basic information,” he said. “We do not believe there was any merit whatsoever to the town's position in withholding this information. We were looking forward to having a court rule on this.”
Bromson said Enfield has always publicly released settlements that involved a single case. He called the nine police brutality cases “a unique circumstance.” Bromson said making the settlements public is “a gray area of the law,” adding CIRMA is exempt from the state's open record laws.
“It's the first situation like this where we had a cluster of lawsuits [involving the same individual]. I cannot remember a case like this within the police department in my 20 years as town attorney,” Bromson said.
David Jaffe, the attorney for Damato's estate and most of the plaintiffs in the previous lawsuits, did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday. Jaffe is with Brown, Paindiris & Scott in Glastonbury.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPike Fuels Agrees to Pay $2 Million Settlement to Resolve Alleged New Haven Environmental Violations
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250