Danger of Normalized Malignancy: Attorneys Must Speak Out
We, as lawyers, have a heightened duty to speak out about aberrant presidential behavior that threatens to erode our very democracy.
January 11, 2018 at 04:28 PM
3 minute read
On Jan. 3, Dan Rather denounced President Donald Trump's tweet regarding North Korea boasting that his nuclear button was bigger than Kim Jong Un's button as “so far beyond any norm of advisable presidential behavior as to defy reason.”
This comment harkens back to April 2017 when, after meeting at Yale University, a group of 27 psychiatrists, psychologists and mental health experts opined that as “witnessing professionals” they had an ethical duty to warn people about the danger of Trump.
The danger to which they referred has been coined “malignant normality” by psychiatrist Dr. Robert J. Lifton, one of the 27 and a researcher into the psychological effects of war and political violence. This term grew out of Lifton's work on Nazi war crimes in which he identified the principle that when ordinary people are continuously exposed to evil ideologies over a period of time—and even though they believe they are resisting the evil ideas, they become socialized to them—resulting in a climate that makes such behavior socially acceptable and perceived as normal.
Through this process, these destructive influences can then be inculcated into an otherwise reasonable society and can lead that society to do things it would otherwise never do. Through this socialization process, Nazi doctors and other professionals were “reduced to being automatic servants of the existing regime as opposed to people with special knowledge balanced by a moral baseline as well as the scientific information to make judgments.”
According to Lifton, Trump's presidency is earmarked by a level of behavior that has been unthinkable for presidents in the past and is little by little morphing into expected conduct for the president. Many people who were once shocked by Trump's behavior are slowly becoming accustomed to it. This has resulted in a “gradual begrudging acceptance of his crude and belligerent treatment of others from foreign leaders to fellow Americans which has resulted as the new normal in American politics,” in other words, a state of malignant normality is being created.
Lifton describes the current political climate as normalizing Trump's behavior when members of both parties fail to explicitly criticize each of his aberrant behaviors.
With the president's problematic behavior escalating, one would expect people to be speaking out more than ever. His incessant and continuous extreme communication and behavior, however, have seemingly worn people down and perhaps makes protest seems fruitless. But speaking out is more important now than ever to halt the further normalizing and acceptance of his behaviors.
As Lifton asserts, like the mental health professionals who have a duty to warn about the danger of this presidency, all professionals, including lawyers, as “witnessing professionals,” also have an obligation to contest the president's problematic behavior “rather than being servants of the powers responsible for the malignant normality … we must be people with a conscience in a very fundamental way.”
We, as lawyers, trained in the law, including on issues of justice and constitutionality which are the bedrock of our democracy, have a heightened duty to speak out about aberrant presidential behavior that threatens to erode that very democracy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Stormy Daniels 'Hush Money' Trial: Donald Trump Should Be Very Worried
7 minute readShining a Light on Opposing Hate: The Palestinian Protesters Who Defended New Haven's Menorah
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250