Danger of Normalized Malignancy: Attorneys Must Speak Out
We, as lawyers, have a heightened duty to speak out about aberrant presidential behavior that threatens to erode our very democracy.
January 11, 2018 at 04:28 PM
3 minute read
On Jan. 3, Dan Rather denounced President Donald Trump's tweet regarding North Korea boasting that his nuclear button was bigger than Kim Jong Un's button as “so far beyond any norm of advisable presidential behavior as to defy reason.”
This comment harkens back to April 2017 when, after meeting at Yale University, a group of 27 psychiatrists, psychologists and mental health experts opined that as “witnessing professionals” they had an ethical duty to warn people about the danger of Trump.
The danger to which they referred has been coined “malignant normality” by psychiatrist Dr. Robert J. Lifton, one of the 27 and a researcher into the psychological effects of war and political violence. This term grew out of Lifton's work on Nazi war crimes in which he identified the principle that when ordinary people are continuously exposed to evil ideologies over a period of time—and even though they believe they are resisting the evil ideas, they become socialized to them—resulting in a climate that makes such behavior socially acceptable and perceived as normal.
Through this process, these destructive influences can then be inculcated into an otherwise reasonable society and can lead that society to do things it would otherwise never do. Through this socialization process, Nazi doctors and other professionals were “reduced to being automatic servants of the existing regime as opposed to people with special knowledge balanced by a moral baseline as well as the scientific information to make judgments.”
According to Lifton, Trump's presidency is earmarked by a level of behavior that has been unthinkable for presidents in the past and is little by little morphing into expected conduct for the president. Many people who were once shocked by Trump's behavior are slowly becoming accustomed to it. This has resulted in a “gradual begrudging acceptance of his crude and belligerent treatment of others from foreign leaders to fellow Americans which has resulted as the new normal in American politics,” in other words, a state of malignant normality is being created.
Lifton describes the current political climate as normalizing Trump's behavior when members of both parties fail to explicitly criticize each of his aberrant behaviors.
With the president's problematic behavior escalating, one would expect people to be speaking out more than ever. His incessant and continuous extreme communication and behavior, however, have seemingly worn people down and perhaps makes protest seems fruitless. But speaking out is more important now than ever to halt the further normalizing and acceptance of his behaviors.
As Lifton asserts, like the mental health professionals who have a duty to warn about the danger of this presidency, all professionals, including lawyers, as “witnessing professionals,” also have an obligation to contest the president's problematic behavior “rather than being servants of the powers responsible for the malignant normality … we must be people with a conscience in a very fundamental way.”
We, as lawyers, trained in the law, including on issues of justice and constitutionality which are the bedrock of our democracy, have a heightened duty to speak out about aberrant presidential behavior that threatens to erode that very democracy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Stormy Daniels 'Hush Money' Trial: Donald Trump Should Be Very Worried
7 minute readShining a Light on Opposing Hate: The Palestinian Protesters Who Defended New Haven's Menorah
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 2Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
- 3While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
- 4The Definition of Special Employment
- 5People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250