State Among Frequent Opponents to Trump Administration Policies
Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen has joined in on more than 30 lawsuits or amicus briefs against the Trump administration, with more expected down the road.
January 18, 2018 at 04:23 PM
4 minute read
Connecticut has become one of the more active blue states in signing on to lawsuits or amicus briefs against the Trump administration, often joining challenges alongside New York and California.
Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen has joined New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and California Attorney General Xavier Becerra on most of the multistate lawsuits against the administration since Donald Trump took office. The Democratic attorneys general represent a slew of states that have put a spotlight on what they call an overreach by the administration.
Jepsen, who has been attorney general for about seven years, said his office has signed on to about 30 lawsuits and amicus briefs this past year. All of the work is done in-house. Despite the volume, the workload requires few resources from his office.
“The overwhelming majority of the legal actions that are taken involves our office reviewing someone else's work product and possibly offering suggestions,” Jepsen said.
In deciding what cases to pursue with other states, Jepsen said he first examines whether and how the issue affects Connecticut residents. Many of the lawsuits Connecticut joined have dealt with the environment, including opposition to the president's executive order killing the Clean Power Plan and opposing federal rules to subsidize nuclear power plants.
The latest example came Wednesday when Jepsen's office joined New York in suing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency over its alleged failure to control ozone pollution from upwind states.
Jepsen said environmental issues should matter to everyone in the Nutmeg State.
“For children and the elderly, especially, the issue is enormous. People are dying in Connecticut because of polluted air,” Jepsen said. “Every one of us are breathing more polluted air than we should be because [EPA Administrator] Scott Pruitt is not enforcing the law.”
Most of the litigation is pending and could take months or years to conclude, but Jepsen said there has been progress. A federal appeals court ruled this past summer that the EPA cannot suspend a President Barack Obama-era rule that restricts methane emissions from new oil and gas wells.
Jepsen scoffs at any notion that his office takes cases solely for political reasons. He said each case Connecticut joins is evaluated on its merits.
It is not unusual for Democratic attorneys general such as Jepsen, Becerra and Schneiderman to lead the charge in filing lawsuits against a Republican president, just as it was not unusual for Republican attorneys general to file suits against Obama on issues related to his executive orders and marquee legislation, such as the Affordable Care Act. Though legal scholars say they believe the partisan divide has intensified in recent years.
As far as future lawsuits or amicus briefs, Jepsen said stemming the opioid epidemic is something both parties have worked on.
How attorneys and those in the legal community view Jepsen working with other states against the administration often comes down to party lines.
Attorney Herb Shepardson, who was the head of the Connecticut Republican Party from 2002-04, said he is concerned about the motivation behind some of the lawsuits.
“I have a lot of respect for George Jepsen and I think he has done many good things as attorney general,” said Shepardson of Cooney, Scully & Downing. “But, the pursuit of some of these lawsuit could be problematic. I do have concerns for the motivation of some of these lawsuits.”
Shepardson declined to elaborate on how the pursuit of lawsuits could be problematic.
Democrats counter that Jepsen is doing his job in the wake of what some see as an administration that has done everything in its power to undo Obama's legacy.
“The Trump administration has really embraced social and legal policies that are very different from previous administrations,” said Democrat John Thomas, a law professor at Quinnipiac University. “They have different environmental policies and different immigration policies, among others. It makes sense, to me, that this attorney general would voice his opinion about it.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readFederal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250