'This Is a Good Thing': CT Attorneys Support Justice Dept.'s FCA Memo
Although caught by surprise, Connecticut attorneys generally support an internal DOJ memo urging government attorneys to dismiss meritless False Claims Act cases.
January 25, 2018 at 03:41 PM
3 minute read
The Connecticut legal community was caught by surprise but is generally supportive of an internal memo directing Department of Justice lawyers to seek dismissal of qui tam False Claims Act cases they deem “meritless.”
Past protocol was for the DOJ to join the litigation or opt not to intervene. The memo from Michael Granston, director of the Justice Department's commercial litigation branch, was sent to branch attorneys and assistant U.S. attorneys across the nation on Jan. 10.
The memo, obtained by sister publication The National Law Journal, outlines factors attorneys should consider when deciding whether to seek dismissal of FCA cases brought by qui tam relators on behalf of the government. While the department can move to dismiss such cases, it's rarely done.
Factors include whether the cases are duplicative of a government investigation, interfere with agency policies or programs, or would set unfavorable precedents.
“This is a good thing as it brings more efficiency to the way the judicial system addresses qui tam actions,” said Ross Garber, a partner with Shipman & Goodwin and co-chairman of the firm's government investigation and white-collar crime group. “Connecticut has its fair share of qui tam cases and the implication is that only those with merit will survive for very long. It puts less of a burden on the government, the defendant and the judicial system.”
Garber said he is confident the government will not dismiss cases unless they are frivolous in nature. Many of the cases deal with Medicare, and road construction and aerospace claims.
“Honestly, I've found the government in this district does a lot of work to evaluate False Claims Act actions,” Garber said. “I really believe they will evaluate each case on its merits.”
Charles Goetsch, a New Haven solo practitioner specializing in whistleblower cases, said he also does not believe the government will dismiss legitimate cases.
“I think the DOJ is simply saying they do not want to waste their limited time and resources on frivolous cases,” Goetsch said. “If that is the case, I do not think any attorney would have a problem with it.”
Goetsch said the Justice Department recommendation should not affect his practice because he reviews clients' cases before taking them on.
“I don't take frivolous cases,” he said. “Part of my job is to screen potential relators to make sure the case has merit.”
Goetsch noted that it's in the government's best interest not to dismiss legitimate cases.
“Last year, $3.7 billion in defrauded taxpayer money was returned to the government because of qui tam actions,” Goetsch said. “The government would want to continue with meritorious qui tam cases. It is in their interest and the taxpayers interest.”
Stan Twardy Jr., a partner with Day Pitney in Hartford and head of the firm's FCA division, said the DOJ's recommendation presents “such a sea change to what we had in the past.”
“It will have a significant impact on the system because there are many cases in which the government has not intervened in the past and which they will now move forward to have those cases dismissed,” Twardy said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute read
Federal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
