New Milford Residents Seek to Block Solar Power Farm
A group of New Milford residents has bandied together to appeal a Connecticut Siting Council ruling that would pave the way for the largest solar power farm located in their backyard.
February 15, 2018 at 02:54 PM
3 minute read
Citing potential dangers to the environment, neighbors of a prospective solar farm in New Milford have appealed a ruling that would permit a Massachusetts-based company to install approximately 15,000 solar panels.
Claiming the approval process was rushed and would cause irreparable harm to the environment, Lisa and Michael Ostrove, Rescue Candlewood Mountain and Candlelight Farms Aviation is asking a New Britain Superior Court to overturn the Connecticut Siting Council's ruling OK'ing the project. The project, the plaintiffs argue, was approved without a plan to adequately manage storm water, and would cut through a huge swath of critical forest. The request to overturn the ruling was filed Feb. 1.
The project, the plaintiffs argue, would require chopping down nearly 70 acres of forest near Candlewood Lake. In addition, the forest is part of a larger block of contiguous forest, which totals 788 acres to the north of the project site.
“Such large, unfragmented forest blocks are a valuable and diminishing resource in Connecticut,” according to the complaint.
If the ruling stands, the project would be the state's largest solar power farm.
The Siting Council signed off on a declaratory ruling on the project for Candlewood Solar LLC Dec. 21, despite opposition by several state agencies, including the Department of Energy & Environmental Protection, and the Department of Agriculture.
The five-member Siting Council, which has jurisdiction over sites for electricity-generating facilities, claimed the plan would not negatively affect the environment. The council, in its ruling, wrote that the project met all applicable water quality standards.
Daniel Casagrande, attorney for the plaintiffs, said Thursday that “there are a long list of dangers” to the project. In addition, he said, the solar panels would benefit only Massachusetts and possibly Rhode Island residents.
“Connecticut has been trying to protect, rather than diminish the forest land,” said Casagrande, a partner with Cramer & Anderson in Danbury. “We believe there was not adequate information about this project provided to the council, such as the effect on wetland and water sources, wildlife and wildlife habitat, storm water draining and erosion issues.”
Casagrande continued: “I am optimistic of victory. We feel this was rushed through with an inadequate presentation on a project that will have serious long-term environmental consequences for the people not only in New Milford, but the entire state.”
In addition to the environmental factors, the complaint states that the glare from the solar panels is a safety concern for the small aircraft using the Candlelight Farms Airport. The project is located half a mile from the airport.
The New Britain-based council was represented by Robert Marconi, assistant attorney general. Marconi said Thursday: “I feel that the Siting Council has always done a good job in the past and I look forward to defending them.” He did not elaborate.
Candlewood Solar is represented by Paul Michaud of The Michaud Law Group in Hartford. Michaud did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHigh-Low Settlement Agreement 'Does Not Alone Establish Bias:' State High Court Affirms $20M Med Mal Verdict
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250