$28 Million Tobacco Verdict Stands for Cancer Victim
Former Norwich resident and smoker Barbara Izzarelli is in line to receive at least $28.1 million in damages against R.J. Reynolds after the U.S. Supreme Court decided not to hear the case.
February 28, 2018 at 06:48 PM
4 minute read
An R.J. Reynolds plant in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Photo: Nell Redmond/Bloomberg
The U.S. Supreme Court will not review a ruling upholding a $28.1 million jury verdict, the first in New England, against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. for a Connecticut smoker who now breathes through a hole in her throat.
The Monday decision means the case returns to the U.S. district court in Bridgeport, where additional punitive damages may be added. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the jury's award in October.
Barbara Izzarelli, a former Norwich resident now living in Florida, was awarded $13.6 million in damages after the jury found in 2010 that R.J. Reynolds acted with reckless disregard for the safety of consumers. The jury also found Izzarelli 42 percent at fault for smoking the cigarettes.
That reduced the initial jury award in 2010 to about $8 million. Seven months later, Judge Stefan Underhill added $4 million in punitive damages.
Reynolds turned down a settlement offer of $400,000 in 1999, meaning Izzarelli is entitled under state statute to 12 percent annual interest on that offer from 1999 to 2011. That tacks on an additional $15.7 million.
Prejudgment interest increases the total to $28.1 million.
In addition, the Second Circuit held that Underhill should re-determine the punitive damages.
According to David Golub, Izzarelli's attorney, Underhill can now award punitive damages anywhere up to two times the compensatory damages, which were $7.9 million. That could add on an additional $15.8 million.
Underhill will probably rule within the next two months, said Golub, a partner with Silver Golub & Teitell in Stamford.
Golub said in a statement and emails that the tobacco giant targeted his client when she was a child. Izzarelli, 57, began smoking Salem Kings at age 12, developed cancer and needed surgery to remove her larynx at age 36. The procedure left her with an opening through her throat to permit breathing.
Izzarelli, 57, developed larynx cancer after smoking Salem cigarettes for more than 25 years. She was forced have her larynx surgically removed, requiring her to breathe through a hole in her throat. She currently lives in Holly Hill, Florida.
Irrazelli argued Reynolds had undertaken a campaign to market Salems to minors, with nicotine levels that would give users amounts above the threshold for addiction.
A jury held that the Salem cigarettes were unreasonably dangerous and defectively designed, and that R.J. Reynolds had acted with reckless disregard for the safety of consumers.
Dr. K. Michael Cummings, professor at the Medical University of South Carolina, testified as an expert on the public health issues in the case.
In a release by Golub, Cummings said, “The tobacco companies have discounted the significance of the verdicts against them in Florida as an aberration because of the Engelclass action there,” he said. “This verdict demonstrates that the verdicts in Florida are no flukes and that the tobacco companies will be held liable in the Northeast and elsewhere. This unanimous verdict in Connecticut, with its substantial damages and punitive damages award, should send shivers down the tobacco companies' CEO's spines.”
Theodore M. Grossman of Jones Day, representing Reynolds, could not immediately be reached.
“Barbara Izzarelli has fought long and hard against R.J. Reynolds, which targeted her with a product that was specifically designed to addict her,” Golub said in a statement this week. “Although it will not bring back her health, this ruling does give her a final victory.”
Izzarelli ended the habit in her mid-30s.
Salem was sold to ITG Brands, a subsidiary of Japan-based Imperial Tobacco, in 2015.
Theodore Grossman, of counsel at Jones Day, represents Reynolds. He was out of the country and did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMajor Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: It's Bonus Time
- 3Maryland Atty Pushes Judge to Grant Discovery in Reverse Discrimination Suit Against King & Spalding
- 4Thompson Coburn Hit With Class Action Over Data Breach
- 5The Coming of Trump's Judicial Picks Spurs Liberals to Press for Biden's
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250