Danbury Hires Ventura Law to Pursue Opioid Litigation
Danbury has hired Ventura Law to study a prospective lawsuit against opioid manufacturers and distributors.
March 09, 2018 at 12:33 PM
4 minute read
The Danbury City Council voted this week to hire the Ventura Law firm to represent it in potential litigation against some of the nation's largest pharmaceutical companies for their alleged role in causing the opioid crisis.
Ventura Law's Chief Executive Officer Augie Ribeiro told the Connecticut Law Tribune Friday that he expects to file a lawsuit in Danbury Superior Court by year's end. The council's move comes on the heels of two other law firms—Scott + Scott and Simmons Hanly Conroy—filing opioid lawsuits on behalf of more than 20 Connecticut municipalities over the past six months.
The Danbury lawsuit would be the firm's first foray into the ongoing opioid litigation. The firm will partner with Branstetter, Stranch & Jennings, a Tennessee-based firm that has filed opioid-related lawsuits on behalf of 47 counties in that state.
“We will be working side-by-side with Branstetter,” Ribeiro said. “They, like us, are in for the long haul. We will be 50-50 partners. We will both be sharing the risk, the expenses and the time down the middle.”
Ventura Law's Kelly Fitzpatrick, who will be lead co-counsel with Ribeiro, said the lawsuit will be similar to those filed on behalf of municipalities such as Waterbury, New Haven and New Britain.
“I think we will be successful because there is plenty of evidence out there that the manufacturers convinced the medical community, and society in general, that there was a pain crisis, thereby creating the opioid crisis,” Fitzpatrick said. “They misled the medical community be claiming opioids were not addictive and downplayed the addictive nature of opioids by promoting opioids for long-term use and chronic pain for decades.”
To date, there are about 180 government plaintiffs suing Big Pharma in multidistrict litigation consolidated in Ohio.
Fitzpatrick said the firm will fight any attempt to move its litigation into the MDL. Fitzpatrick said it's unlikely the case will be removed from the Nutmeg State since one of the defendants, Purdue Pharma, is from Connecticut.
It's also important that the case be heard in Danbury, Fitzpatrick said, “because our communities here in Connecticut are being affected by the opioid crisis. Our juries should be the ones who are hearing the case.”
Part of the delay in filing the lawsuit, Fitzpatrick said, is the need to sit down and talk with city officials and do research on the costs and manpower associated with the epidemic.
Fitzpatrick, who said her firm will begin talking to city officials next week, added, “We will be talking to departments from finance to risk management to discuss what the expenses related to the opioid crisis have been. We also want to plan to forecast and predict what future damages might be.” Other conversations, she said, will take place with fire, police and EMS officials. The two firms, Fitzpatrick said, hope to have an estimated financial number on the toll the crisis has had on the city by the time the suit is filed.
According to the state medical examiner, the total number of overdose deaths, which include opioid deaths, jumped for the first time ever to more than 1,000 in 2017.
While Scott+Scott and Simmons Hanly Conroy will collect up to 33.3 percent of any award under their fee agreements if they win, Ribeiro said his firm is capping the amount at 25 percent.
Ventura Law was founded in 1957 and has been involved in several mass tort and complex litigation claims, including against British Petroleum for its role in one of the world's worst environmental oil disasters.
Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton did not respond to a request for comment Friday.
Purdue Pharma also did not respond to a request for comment Friday. But, in past statements to the Connecticut Law Tribune, the company has said it wants to be part of the opioid solution, and have vowed to fight any allegations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Big Law Congressional Investigation Practices Will Stay Busy in 2025
5 minute read'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
3 minute readDecisions Have 'Real-Life Consequences': Juvenile Court Judge Considered for Appellate Bench
Trending Stories
- 1Trump Nominates Ex-SEC Chief Jay Clayton to Helm Southern District of New York US Attorney's Office
- 2Steward Health CEO Saga Signals Escalation of Coercive Congressional Oversight Against Private Parties
- 3'They Should Have Tried to Negotiate': Jury Finds Against Insurer
- 4Expert Testimony Regarding Sexual Grooming
- 5Actions Speak Louder Than Words: Law Firms Shrink From 'Performative' Statements
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250