Conn. Man Claims NJ Firm Withholding Share of $1.3M in Daughter's Death
Eric Jordan has filed a federal lawsuit against a New Jersey law firm claiming it has not paid him the $336,877 wrongful death settlement he is due related to his daughter's death.
March 23, 2018 at 03:07 PM
4 minute read
A Connecticut man has filed a civil theft suit against a New Jersey law firm, alleging it never paid him $336,877 from a wrongful death settlement involving his daughter, Erica.
The lawsuit, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Connecticut, alleges Newark-based Hunt, Hamlin & Ridley paid Erica's mother her $336,877 share of the settlement. The other half, which 54-year-old Eric Jordan claims is his, has not been released.
Erica's mother, Nickola Glover-Jordan, separated from Jordan, who until recently was homeless, before the girl's death in January 2013. The lawsuit claims the firm is withholding the money “in violation of not just common law, but also [the] Rules of Professional Conduct that control[] conduct of attorneys and law firms such as the defendants.”
Erica was a pedestrian in July 2012 when she was struck by a PSE&G truck in Paterson, New Jersey. Her mother was appointed administratrix of the estate, and a lawsuit was filed against the driver and St. Joseph's Hospital soon after the girl died.
The lawsuit states that Erica, 17, was taken to the emergency room complaining of an inability to breathe six months after the accident. She died at the hospital due to a collapsed lung.
Glover-Jordan retained Hunt Hamlin to pursue a medical malpractice lawsuit against the hospital and a negligence action against PSE&G and its driver, Christopher Duda.
The lawsuit was settled in the first half of 2017 for nearly $1.3 million, of which $673,754 was to be shared by the parents.
At some point in the summer of 2017, the lawsuit states, the law firm requested to meet with Jordan. At the time, the girl's mother said another man was the father, but DNA tests showed that was not the case.
The lawsuit claims there were numerous delays by Hunt Hamlin in getting back to Jordan's attorney even after the DNA tests showed he was the father.
On March 13, the lawsuit states, Jordan's attorney, Kevin Dehghani of Dehghani & Associates in New Haven, reached out to Hunt Hamlin by fax, email and certified mail demanding the firm release Jordan's share of the settlement by close of business on March 16. The New Jersey firm never responded.
Dehghani told the Connecticut Law Tribune that he did hear from Hunt Hamlin Friday morning and was told he'd be getting an email letter on the matter soon.
According to Dehghani, Jordan owes no alimony or child support to Glover-Jordan.
“There has been no reason beyond the initial reasons cited in the complaint [such as the DNA matter] that have since been cleared up, for my client to have not received his portion of the settlement,” Dehghani said. “I'm not aware of a valid defense for my client not getting his money.”
The lawsuit names Hunt Hamlin and partners Raymond Hamlin, Ronald Hunt, and Kenyatta Stewart. The law firm had not assigned an attorney to the case as of Friday. The three attorneys did not respond to a request for comment. Glover-Jordan could not be reached for comment.
The lawsuit includes claims for civil theft, conversion and violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act.
The lawsuit requests a preliminary injunction ordering Hunt Hamlin to “cease and desist from appropriating any portion of the plaintiff's funds that they hold to themselves to any other party.”
The case will be heard by Judge Victor A. Bolden, who is based in Bridgeport.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
High-Low Settlement Agreement 'Does Not Alone Establish Bias:' State High Court Affirms $20M Med Mal Verdict
5 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1The Appropriate Exemption in Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
- 2DOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
- 3New Partners at Cummings & Lockwood, Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey
- 4'Extra Government'?: NY Top Court Eyes Ethics Commission's Constitutionality
- 5South Texas College of Law Houston Selects New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
