'Dangerous Work': Milford Man's Estate Seeks Millions After Fatal Ladder Fall
The estate of Francisco Martija sued property owner TIAA Board of Overseers, seeking millions of dollars in damages.
March 27, 2018 at 06:27 PM
3 minute read
Attorneys for a Milford man who died after falling from a ladder at a construction site have filed a wrongful death lawsuit seeking millions of dollars against the building's owner.
The estate of Francisco Martija filed suit March 14 in Milford Superior Court against the TIAA Board of Overseers, which owns the 230,000-square-foot complex where Martija died last July. It claimed the ladder the 62-year-old man used at the job site was improperly secured and had no safety harness.
Plaintiff counsel, Jonathan Perkins, Tuesday said he will seek a jury trial and an award “at least in the seven figures, if not in the eight figures” against TIAA.
TIAA had not assigned an attorney to the case as of press time Tuesday, and no one from its media relations department responded to a request for comment.
Martija died soon after he fell from the six-foot stepladder placed on top of a mobile scaffold on a building at 10 Westport St. in Wilton. He was repairing a leak in a window on the roof, when he lost his balance and crashed headfirst into the concrete below, according to Perkins. It is not clear how many feet Martija fell or whether he was wearing a hard hat, said Perkins, who hopes to learn more during discovery.
Martija worked for Property Group Partners of Wilton, who are not defendants in the lawsuit, although Perkins said additional defendants could be added during the discovery process.
Meanwhile, plaintiff's counsel remains focused on TIAA, and what he describes as the company's failure to toward Martija.
“They did not provide or train him in the use of appropriate safety equipment for someone working at an elevation like that,” said Perkins, who heads Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers. “They did not train him on how to work safely in heights like he was working on at the time. It is highly dangerous work, and they did not provide proper equipment, training or supervision.”
Plus, Perkins maintains, the ladder was not properly erected.
“It's my understanding that the ladder was being used in a closed, rather than open, position,” he said. “If either the scaffold or the ladder had moved, he would have been more prone, because the ladder was in a closed position, to fall and a long way down.”
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has investigated and cited Property Group Partners for violating federal regulations governing ladder usage. But OSHA did not cite TIAA.
Perkins said it is not unusual for the regulator to take action against one company, and not the other.
“OSHA tends to focus largely on the employer since they deal with occupational safety,” Perkins said. “But TIAA was the owner of the property, and they had control of the property.”
A judge has yet to be assigned to the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPike Fuels Agrees to Pay $2 Million Settlement to Resolve Alleged New Haven Environmental Violations
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Standing for Plaintiffs in Copyright Suit Over AI Training of ChatGPT
- 2LA Judge Anne Hwang Confirmed to the Federal Bench
- 3NY Court Leaders Ask for 10% Judiciary Budget Increase
- 4ClaimClam Wanted to Boost Class Action Claims Rates. But Judges and Attorneys Fought Back
- 5'We Will Sue ... Immediately': AG Bonta Says He's Ready to Spend $25M Battling Trump
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250