'Dangerous Work': Milford Man's Estate Seeks Millions After Fatal Ladder Fall
The estate of Francisco Martija sued property owner TIAA Board of Overseers, seeking millions of dollars in damages.
March 27, 2018 at 06:27 PM
3 minute read
Attorneys for a Milford man who died after falling from a ladder at a construction site have filed a wrongful death lawsuit seeking millions of dollars against the building's owner.
The estate of Francisco Martija filed suit March 14 in Milford Superior Court against the TIAA Board of Overseers, which owns the 230,000-square-foot complex where Martija died last July. It claimed the ladder the 62-year-old man used at the job site was improperly secured and had no safety harness.
Plaintiff counsel, Jonathan Perkins, Tuesday said he will seek a jury trial and an award “at least in the seven figures, if not in the eight figures” against TIAA.
TIAA had not assigned an attorney to the case as of press time Tuesday, and no one from its media relations department responded to a request for comment.
Martija died soon after he fell from the six-foot stepladder placed on top of a mobile scaffold on a building at 10 Westport St. in Wilton. He was repairing a leak in a window on the roof, when he lost his balance and crashed headfirst into the concrete below, according to Perkins. It is not clear how many feet Martija fell or whether he was wearing a hard hat, said Perkins, who hopes to learn more during discovery.
Martija worked for Property Group Partners of Wilton, who are not defendants in the lawsuit, although Perkins said additional defendants could be added during the discovery process.
Meanwhile, plaintiff's counsel remains focused on TIAA, and what he describes as the company's failure to toward Martija.
“They did not provide or train him in the use of appropriate safety equipment for someone working at an elevation like that,” said Perkins, who heads Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers. “They did not train him on how to work safely in heights like he was working on at the time. It is highly dangerous work, and they did not provide proper equipment, training or supervision.”
Plus, Perkins maintains, the ladder was not properly erected.
“It's my understanding that the ladder was being used in a closed, rather than open, position,” he said. “If either the scaffold or the ladder had moved, he would have been more prone, because the ladder was in a closed position, to fall and a long way down.”
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has investigated and cited Property Group Partners for violating federal regulations governing ladder usage. But OSHA did not cite TIAA.
Perkins said it is not unusual for the regulator to take action against one company, and not the other.
“OSHA tends to focus largely on the employer since they deal with occupational safety,” Perkins said. “But TIAA was the owner of the property, and they had control of the property.”
A judge has yet to be assigned to the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSettlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
4 minute readJudge Awards Over $350K in Attorney Fees in Data Breach Class Action Settlement
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 2Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
- 3Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
- 4Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 5'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250