Bristol Man Gets $390,000 Workers' Comp Settlement After Second Back Injury
Jerold Colwell, who reinjured his back on the job in 2016, got a $390,000 workers' compensation settlement.
April 19, 2018 at 06:37 PM
2 minute read
A 69-year-old Bristol man secured a $390,000 workers' compensation settlement with his former employer after he reinjured his back while carrying steel.
Jerold Colwell's back pain returned May 2016, 11 years after his first injury at work, according to his attorney, Alexander Sarris, an associate with Hartford's Cicchiello & Cicchiello.
Sarris said Colwell was carrying steel for the New Haven-based New England Linen Supply Co., a manufacturing and textile business, both times he was injured. He had worked for the company for about 20 years until the injury forced him to leave the job in 2016, according to Sarris.
For Sarris, the biggest obstacle was linking the second injury to the first.
“Anytime there is a lengthy period … between workers' compensation claims, it's harder to prove they are related, especially if there is a flare-up,” Sarris said Thursday.
Colwell had back surgery in 2006, soon after his initial injury. He got a $45,000 payment on that workers' compensation claim.
But an MRI taken 10 years later showed his lumbar spine was getting worse.
“At that point, both sides engaged in settlement discussions,” Sarris said.
The parties negotiated for several months before agreeing on the $390,000 settlement April 2.
New England Linen Supply's attorney was Brian Smith, of Pomeranz, Drayton & Stabnick in Glastonbury. He pushed to settle for less than $300,000, but the plaintiff sought “something in the upper $300,000 range.”
Smith was on vacation and unavailable for comment by deadline.
“We were able to work it out amicably among ourselves without a mediator,” Sarris said.
The bulk of the settlement—$295,000—will go to a Medicare set-aside fund, which Colwell can only use for future medical expenses. The remaining $95,000 has no strings attached.
Sarris says Colwell will likely need another back surgery.
New England Linen Supply's insurer, Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., will cover the settlement.
Colwell “had a very legitimate injury, and it's nice to see him being compensated for that,” Sarris said. “My client was very relieved. It was a long process for him.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPike Fuels Agrees to Pay $2 Million Settlement to Resolve Alleged New Haven Environmental Violations
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Mattel Sued Over 'Wicked' Dolls With Pornographic Website
- 2Brown Rudnick’s Brand and Reputation Group Unfazed After Loss of 6 Prominent Partners and Their Big-Name Clients
- 3Fulton Judge Weighs Whether to Order Fani Willis to Comply With Lawmakers' Subpoenas Over Trump Case
- 4Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
- 5Judge Rises to Tifton Superior Court Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250