Domino's Deliveryman Who Had 400 Pounds of Cheese Fall on Him Gets $180,000
Mohammed Hassan injured his left ankle, left knee and back after a hand truck with about 400 pounds of cheese fell on him. He settled his workers' compensation claim for $180,000.
April 24, 2018 at 05:56 PM
2 minute read
For many pizza lovers, the cheese is the best part of the pie.
But for one deliveryman, it proved catastrophic.
Domino's National Commissary employee Mohammed Hassan was delivering about 400 pounds of cheese when his hand truck slipped and slammed into his knee and ankle.
He settled a workers' compensation claim on April 14 for $180,000.
“My client is obviously limited because of his injury, but considering the weight of the cheese, he is lucky his injuries are not a lot worse,” attorney Brooke Goff said Tuesday.
Hassan injured his left ankle, left knee and back in June 2016 while delivering cheese to a Domino's restaurant in East Granby. His hand truck was wet from rain, and it slid and smashed into him.
The impact caused him to fall on his back.
Hassan, a 55-year-old Meriden resident, was forced to leave his job immediately, according to his attorney. He wore a leg brace for six months, had a fractured left foot and got a torn meniscus repaired, Goff said. He also needed several injections to his left ankle to alleviate pain and improve mobility. His attorney said knee-replacement surgery is also a possibility because of lingering pain.
“At first, the defense denied everything,” Goff said. “We had to go back and forth to get the claim accepted.”
Domino's National Commissary hired three doctors, but Goff said they all agreed Hassan's injuries were related to his fall.
“It took months of delays, though,” Goff said.
Goff settled the case with Samantha Levasseur, attorney for Domino's and Sedgwick Insurance, the company's carrier, in front of Hartford-based workers' compensation commissioner Ernie Walker.
Levasseur, of Goldberg Segalla in Hartford, did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
Domino's initial offer was $100,000, against the plaintiff's $325,000 demand. Its insurer paid Hassan the $180,000 settlement last week.
Meanwhile, Goff said Hassan considers himself lucky to have escaped more serious injuries from the hundreds of pounds of dairy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMajor Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Julie Cantor, Associate General Counsel at Studs, Inc.
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Chris Correnti, President & CEO & General Counsel AGC America, Inc.
- 4‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
- 5Cravath Matches 'Special' and Year-End Bonuses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250