CT Drug Rehab Center Pays $1.3M for Fraudulent Claims
New Era Rehabilitation Center agreed to settle allegations it fraudulently billed Medicaid for services to patients fighting methadone addiction.
May 02, 2018 at 02:34 PM
3 minute read
A Connecticut-based substance abuse treatment facility has agreed to pay $1.37 million to settle claims it defrauded the Medicaid program.
The agreement by the Connecticut Attorney General's Office and the U.S. Attorney's Office of the District of Connecticut with New Era Rehabilitation Center would resolve allegations the business violated the state and federal False Claims Act. But it first requires judicial approval.
“We must ensure that taxpayers' health care dollars used for substance abuse treatment are properly spent,” U.S. Attorney for Connecticut John Durham said in a statement after the parties settled the case April 27. “Medical practices and physicians who treat patients for substance abuse must bill their services accurately and honestly. Health care providers who submit false claims to federal health care programs will be held accountable.”
The case is pending before Judge Vanessa Bryant after prosecutors filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut in Hartford Tuesday.
The government alleges New Era double billed Medicaid for services to patients fighting methadone addiction. It claims the rehab center got paid a weekly “bundled rate” that covered intake evaluations, on-site drug abuse testing and monitoring, initial physical examinations and counseling services for individuals, groups and families.
The counseling services were included in the bundled rate, but New Era also billed separately for them.
Prosecutors allege the center never provided psychotherapy, submitted false billing claims, and only offered the counseling sessions covered by the weekly bundled rate.
New Era has offices in New Haven and Bridgeport. The company's website states it provides “patient-focused care that results in positive health outcomes and behavioral changes.”
Wiggin and Dana attorneys Judy Erdfarb and Maureen Weaver represent New Era.
The firm released a statement Wednesday on behalf of Ebenezer Kolade. the company's chief executive officer and president.
“For 16 years New Era Rehabilitation Center has been a respected and valued member of the New Haven and Bridgeport communities, providing much-needed behavioral health and substance abuse treatment services,” the statement reads. “NERC has fully cooperated with a recent government investigation into some of its past billing practices and, without admitting any wrongdoing, has reached an agreement in order to settle this matter. This settlement agreement is not an admission of liability. Instead, NERC wishes to avoid the disruption of litigation, and focus on addressing the state's devastating opioid crisis and helping patients recover.”
The seven-count lawsuit claims the company violated state and federal law. It alleges presentation of false claims, making or using a false record or statement, unjust enrichment, payment by mistake, presentation of false claims in violation of Connecticut's FCA, breach of contract, and making or using a false record or statement in violation of Connecticut's FCA.
The case is among the latest across the country involving alleged billing fraud by drug and alcohol rehabilitation centers. It is also the latest in a slew of FCA cases that the U.S. Justice Department said led to the recovery of more than $3.7 billion in fiscal year 2017. The recoveries included $2.4 billion in the health care industry, including drug companies, hospitals, pharmacies, laboratories and physicians, according to the DOJ's website. In many cases, the department helped recover millions of dollars for state Medicaid programs.
Jaclyn Severance, director of communications for the Connecticut Attorney General's Office, declined to comment on the settlement. Tom Carson, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office of the District of Connecticut, also declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPike Fuels Agrees to Pay $2 Million Settlement to Resolve Alleged New Haven Environmental Violations
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250