Meet Richard Robinson, Connecticut's New Chief Justice
Stamford native Richard Robinson, who has enjoyed a long legal career, is known for firing a barrage of questions at attorneys appearing before him.
May 04, 2018 at 03:20 PM
5 minute read
Known for his easy temperament and asking pointed questions during oral arguments, state Supreme Court Justice Richard Robinson has been elevated to the state's chief justice.
The no-nonsense jurist, who is known for being approachable and active in recruiting people of color into the legal profession, became the state's first black chief justice when the state Senate approved his nomination 36-0 Thursday. The vote followed an earlier 146-0 tally in the state House of Representatives.
Robinson's confirmation came after Republicans and Democrats had a contentious battle over Associate Justice Andrew McDonald's bid to become the country's first openly gay chief justice.
Robinson voted with the majority in the court's 5-2 ruling in 2015 finding the death penalty violated the state constitution. He also was part of the unanimous 2017 ruling rebuking the state Department of Children and Families policy to vaccinate children in its custody without parental consent.
Robinson's promotion was met with pride from black attorneys throughout the state, who called his pick inspirational and overdue.
Meet the New Chief Justice
Robinson, a Stamford native, was appointed as a judge of the Connecticut Appellate Court in 2007 and elevated to the state Supreme Court in December 2013.
Robinson, 60, served as staff counsel for the Stamford Law Department from 1985-1988, according to his biography. He became assistant corporation counsel for Stamford in 1988, a position he held until he was named a Superior Court judge in 2000. Robinson served as the presiding civil judge for the New Britain and Stamford judicial districts, and presiding civil judge and assistant administrative judge for the Ansonia/Milford Judicial District.
Robinson's career points to an array of public and judicial service. That includes serving as president of the Stamford branch of the NAACP, and chairman of the Advisory Committee on Cultural Competency. He's also sat on the association's diversity committee for the past three years.
Robinson graduated with a bachelor's degree from the University of Connecticut in 1979 and received a law degree from West Virginia University School of Law in 1984.
A Sense of Pride
West Hartford attorney Garlinck Dumont, president of the George Crawford Black Bar Association, attended the House of Representatives' hearings on judicial nominations last week as a show of support from the association. Dumont said she swelled with pride watching her friend of five years address the House.
Dumont said Robinson's role in the community makes him stand out.
“He is not only well-spoken and the most humble individual you'd ever want to meet, but he also plays an active role in trying to encourage people of color to be law students, attorneys and judges,” she said.
“He is dedicated to his profession and also mentors other attorneys and judges,” Dumont added.
As a member of the black legal community, Robinson & Cole's Christie Jean called Robinson's confirmation a testament to the work being done in Connecticut to promote diversity.
“As a fellow Stamford native and University of Connecticut Husky, I'm bursting with pride and am confident that Chief Justice Robinson will serve with distinction and integrity in a fair and impartial manner as he has already been doing,” Jean said. “His appointment is very important for me to see as a young attorney of color, for our great state of Connecticut, and for the profession at large.”
Robinson's Judicial Style
Anyone appearing before Robinson better be prepared for rapid-fire questions. That's according to attorney Wesley Horton, who has argued about 130 times in front of the court, including about 10 times in front of Robinson.
“He is thoughtful in his questions and his decisions are clear and precise,” said Horton, a partner with Horton Dowd Bartschi & Levesque. “He does not go out of his way to make it look like a moot court. He does not ask questions for the sake of asking questions. His questions are likely to determine which way the case is going.”
Specifically, Horton said, “you have to be very persuasive with him. He will go over line-by-line the statute in question, or contract in question, or whatever is in question. He wants you to support your position.”
Steven Stafstrom Jr. has a unique perspective on Robinson as an attorney and a member of the Statehouse representing Bridgeport.
Stafstrom, an associate with Pullman & Comley, said that as a member of the joint House and Senate Judiciary Committee, he found Robinson fit the bill of what was needed in a chief justice.
“First and foremost, we look for people that are legally competent and experienced,” Stafstrom said. “Beyond that, we look to judicial temperament and a deep experience in judicial affairs. Given his background, he certainly met all of the criteria.”
Robinson also has the respect of his colleagues, Stafstrom said.
“The people I know are saying it's a great choice. He is a well-respected and tempered jurist,” Stafstrom said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConnecticut's Wiggin and Dana Absorbs Boca Raton Trusts and Estates Boutique
3 minute readLaw Firm Leaders Say Gen AI Can Level Playing Field Between Large and Smaller Firms
6 minute readRevenue Up 11.2%, PEP Up 22.1% at Akin, as Aggressive Hiring Pays Off
5 minute readNew England's Hinckley Allen Expands Southward, Opening 7th Office in Fort Lauderdale
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1OCR Issues 'Dear Colleagues' Letter Regarding AI in Medicine
- 2Corporate Litigator Joins BakerHostetler From Fish & Richardson
- 3E-Discovery Provider Casepoint Merges With Government Software Company OPEXUS
- 4How I Made Partner: 'Focus on Being the Best Advocate for Clients,' Says Lauren Reichardt of Cooley
- 5People in the News—Jan. 27, 2025—Barley Snyder
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250