Meet Richard Robinson, Connecticut's New Chief Justice
Stamford native Richard Robinson, who has enjoyed a long legal career, is known for firing a barrage of questions at attorneys appearing before him.
May 04, 2018 at 03:20 PM
5 minute read
Known for his easy temperament and asking pointed questions during oral arguments, state Supreme Court Justice Richard Robinson has been elevated to the state's chief justice.
The no-nonsense jurist, who is known for being approachable and active in recruiting people of color into the legal profession, became the state's first black chief justice when the state Senate approved his nomination 36-0 Thursday. The vote followed an earlier 146-0 tally in the state House of Representatives.
Robinson's confirmation came after Republicans and Democrats had a contentious battle over Associate Justice Andrew McDonald's bid to become the country's first openly gay chief justice.
Robinson voted with the majority in the court's 5-2 ruling in 2015 finding the death penalty violated the state constitution. He also was part of the unanimous 2017 ruling rebuking the state Department of Children and Families policy to vaccinate children in its custody without parental consent.
Robinson's promotion was met with pride from black attorneys throughout the state, who called his pick inspirational and overdue.
Meet the New Chief Justice
Robinson, a Stamford native, was appointed as a judge of the Connecticut Appellate Court in 2007 and elevated to the state Supreme Court in December 2013.
Robinson, 60, served as staff counsel for the Stamford Law Department from 1985-1988, according to his biography. He became assistant corporation counsel for Stamford in 1988, a position he held until he was named a Superior Court judge in 2000. Robinson served as the presiding civil judge for the New Britain and Stamford judicial districts, and presiding civil judge and assistant administrative judge for the Ansonia/Milford Judicial District.
Robinson's career points to an array of public and judicial service. That includes serving as president of the Stamford branch of the NAACP, and chairman of the Advisory Committee on Cultural Competency. He's also sat on the association's diversity committee for the past three years.
Robinson graduated with a bachelor's degree from the University of Connecticut in 1979 and received a law degree from West Virginia University School of Law in 1984.
A Sense of Pride
West Hartford attorney Garlinck Dumont, president of the George Crawford Black Bar Association, attended the House of Representatives' hearings on judicial nominations last week as a show of support from the association. Dumont said she swelled with pride watching her friend of five years address the House.
Dumont said Robinson's role in the community makes him stand out.
“He is not only well-spoken and the most humble individual you'd ever want to meet, but he also plays an active role in trying to encourage people of color to be law students, attorneys and judges,” she said.
“He is dedicated to his profession and also mentors other attorneys and judges,” Dumont added.
As a member of the black legal community, Robinson & Cole's Christie Jean called Robinson's confirmation a testament to the work being done in Connecticut to promote diversity.
“As a fellow Stamford native and University of Connecticut Husky, I'm bursting with pride and am confident that Chief Justice Robinson will serve with distinction and integrity in a fair and impartial manner as he has already been doing,” Jean said. “His appointment is very important for me to see as a young attorney of color, for our great state of Connecticut, and for the profession at large.”
Robinson's Judicial Style
Anyone appearing before Robinson better be prepared for rapid-fire questions. That's according to attorney Wesley Horton, who has argued about 130 times in front of the court, including about 10 times in front of Robinson.
“He is thoughtful in his questions and his decisions are clear and precise,” said Horton, a partner with Horton Dowd Bartschi & Levesque. “He does not go out of his way to make it look like a moot court. He does not ask questions for the sake of asking questions. His questions are likely to determine which way the case is going.”
Specifically, Horton said, “you have to be very persuasive with him. He will go over line-by-line the statute in question, or contract in question, or whatever is in question. He wants you to support your position.”
Steven Stafstrom Jr. has a unique perspective on Robinson as an attorney and a member of the Statehouse representing Bridgeport.
Stafstrom, an associate with Pullman & Comley, said that as a member of the joint House and Senate Judiciary Committee, he found Robinson fit the bill of what was needed in a chief justice.
“First and foremost, we look for people that are legally competent and experienced,” Stafstrom said. “Beyond that, we look to judicial temperament and a deep experience in judicial affairs. Given his background, he certainly met all of the criteria.”
Robinson also has the respect of his colleagues, Stafstrom said.
“The people I know are saying it's a great choice. He is a well-respected and tempered jurist,” Stafstrom said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConnecticut's Wiggin and Dana Absorbs Boca Raton Trusts and Estates Boutique
3 minute readLaw Firm Leaders Say Gen AI Can Level Playing Field Between Large and Smaller Firms
6 minute readRevenue Up 11.2%, PEP Up 22.1% at Akin, as Aggressive Hiring Pays Off
5 minute readNew England's Hinckley Allen Expands Southward, Opening 7th Office in Fort Lauderdale
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250