Hartford Hospital Sued for Removing Healthy Prostate in Botched Cancer Diagnosis
The lawsuit includes claims for personal injury, financial loss and loss of consortium.
May 15, 2018 at 03:12 PM
3 minute read
A Manchester man who allegedly had a healthy prostate removed due to a lab mix-up or mishandling of a biopsy specimen has sued Hartford HealthCare Medical Group and Hartford Hospital.
Attorneys for Fred Parkhurst, 65, said the removal of his prostate was an unacceptable mistake that has caused unbearable grief. The lawsuit was filed May 10 in Hartford Superior Court.
“The loss to Mr. Parkhurst is physical, psychological and emotional. It impacts him in so many ways that people do not consider until something like this befalls them,” said Parkhurst's attorney, John Houlihan Jr., a partner with RisCassi & Davis in Hartford.
Houlihan, who is seeking unspecified monetary damages, said the mix-up is surprising given safeguards that are supposed to be in place. The lawsuit includes claims for personal injury, financial loss, and loss of consortium.
Houlihan said Parkhurst underwent an ultrasound of the rectum and prostate at the Tallwood Urology & Kidney Institute in August 2017 because of an elevated PSA score. A biopsy was also performed. Tallwood is a medical division of Hartford HealthCare, which runs Hartford Hospital.
Laboratory results from Hartford Hospital indicated Parkhurst had an aggressive form of prostate cancer. Parkhurst underwent multiple diagnostic testing procedures, including a bone scan and MRI because of the lab results. All were negative for metastatic disease, which is evidence cancer cells have spread from the primary site.
Parkhurst still underwent surgery to remove his prostate in November 2017 because of the initial cancer diagnosis.
Houlihan said the removed prostate showed no sign of cancer, which caused Hartford Hospital's pathology unit to do a DNA test.
“The DNA was from a different patient,” said Houlihan, who noted it's not clear where the mix-up occurred. “Either Tallwood mislabeled or mishandled the biopsy specimen or the laboratory [at Hartford Hospital] switched the specimen with that of another patient.”
Houlihan said he should be able to pinpoint blame through the discovery process.
Shawn Mawhiney, director of communications for Hartford HealthCare, declined to comment Tuesday.
Houlihan said his client is dealing with incontinence because of the surgery. In addition, the lawsuit states that Parkhurst suffers from sexual dysfunction, scarring and physical and emotional pain and anguish.
Parkhurst, who works for a food retailer, was out of work for about 10 weeks due to the surgery. Parkhurst has returned to work on a limited basis, Houlihan said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readAttorney Overcomes Low Medical Bills, Captures $1 Million Policy Limit
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Examining New York Court Decisions on Website Accessibility Claims
- 2What to Expect in the Securities Enforcement Space in 2025
- 3Against All Odds—How to Try, and Win, High-Leverage Cases
- 4Evolving Legal Standards to Combat Disqualification of Arbitrators for Failing to Disclose Conflicts of Interest
- 5Class Gifts and NY’s 'Adoption Out' Statute: Guidance for NY Fiduciaries on Minimizing Litigation Risks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250