Connecticut Lawyers Sue Conspiracy Theorist Alex Jones for Sandy Hook Families, FBI Agent
The suit names defendants in Texas, Florida, Connecticut and Minnesota. It cites a yearslong campaign of inflammatory statements by Jones, who claims the shooting was a government conspiracy.
May 23, 2018 at 03:38 PM
4 minute read
Trial lawyers from Bridgeport, Connecticut-based Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder filed suit Wednesday against media personality Alex Jones on behalf of an FBI agent and the families of six victims of the deadly Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.
Bill Bloss, Josh Koskoff and Matt Blumenthal filed the defamation lawsuit, naming defendants in Texas, Florida, Connecticut and Minnesota. They cite a years-long campaign of inflammatory statements by Jones, who claims the shooting was a government conspiracy.
“Time and again, Jones has accused Sandy Hook families, who are readily identifiable, of faking their loved ones' deaths, and insisted that the children killed that day are actually alive,” according to the complaint filed in Bridgeport Superior Court in Connecticut.
Jones is the host of “InfoWars” and “The Alex Jones Show.” The lawsuit alleges he used his media platforms to wage a campaign of lies aimed at intentionally hurting the victims of the shooting by Adam Lanza, who killed 20 students and six educators in December 2012. It alleges Jones uses false narratives as part of a “marketing scheme that has brought him and his business entities tens of million of dollars per year.”
“Our complaint draws a very clear relationship between the money-making aspect of his business and him seeking ratings,” plaintiff counsel Bloss told the Connecticut Law Tribune. “People can believe anything, but people don't have the right to lie about someone else to make money.”
Along with Jones, the suit names as defendants Florida resident Wolfgang Halbig, who used crowdfunding to support his efforts against the Newtown school board and town council; Jones' Texas-based companies Infowars LLC, Free Speech Systems LLC, Infowars Health LLC and Prison Planet TV LLC; Minnesota-based Genesis Communications Network Inc. and Midas Resources Inc.; and Cory T. Sklanka, a Meriden, Connecticut, resident who contributes to Jones' broadcasts.
No one from Jones' company responded to a request for comment Wednesday. Halbig could not immediately be reached, and Sklanka did not respond to a request for comment by press time. As of Wednesday afternoon, no attorney had put in an appearance for the defendants.
“The primary motivating factor for us in filing this is accountability,” Bloss said. ”We need to hold these people accountable for a pattern of falsehoods that has caused unimaginable anguish to these victims and has revictimized them.”
The plaintiffs include FBI agent William Aldenberg, one of the first responders on the scene of the mass shooting and the relatives of four children and two adults killed that day. He stepped into the fray after conspiracy theorists called him a ”crisis actor,” and repeatedly said that he and Sandy Hook parent David Wheeler were the same person.
Aldenberg joined Jacqueline and Mark Barden, who lost their son Daniel; Nicole and Ian Hockley, parents of Dylan; Francine and David Wheeler, whose son Ben lost his life; and Jennifer Hensel and Jeremy Richman, parents of Avielle. The mother and three siblings of first-grade teacher Victoria Soto also joined the suit, along with Erica Lafferty-Garbatini, the daughter of school principal Dawn Hochspring.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages, and demands a jury trial in Connecticut.
“The victims here are or were members of the Connecticut community, and we have an interest in protecting members of the Connecticut community,” Bloss said.
The 42-page lawsuit lists a litany of alleged statements made by Jones, Halbig and Sklanka.
It quotes Jones as saying, “I knew they had actors there, clearly, but I thought they killed some real kids, and it just shows how bold they are that they clearly used actors.”
The complaint is at least the third by Sandy Hook families against Jones. In April, Connecticut attorneys at Kaster Lynch Farrar & Ball filed two complaints in Austin, Texas, on behalf of parents Neil Heslin, Leonard Pozner and his former wife Veronique De La Rosa.
Those families lost 6-year-old boys in the shooting.
Read the complaint:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllT14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
Wrongful-Death Case Against Adult Day Care Sparks Call for State Regulation
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250