With the retirement of Anthony Kennedy, the two Latin words most everyone will be speaking/debating the meaning of/bemoaning are stare and decisis. A few weeks ago I started putting together a syllabus, as it appears I will be again teaching a first-year legal research and writing course. While it’s now relatively easy to teach how to find the latest and best law in this age of electronic search engines and instant citators, a skill that’s harder to impart is predicting where the law will go. Stare decisis is a big issue.

Looking to update my course a bit, I abandoned the two cases I usually start the semester with, a pair of New Jersey cases tracking the development of liability theories dealing with the residual tort liability of sellers in real property conveyances, and decided to use Lawrence v. Texas instead. Lawrence was the 2003 decision which reversed Bowers v. Hardwick, dealing with Texas’ sodomy law. Lawrence is a good case to teach because it’s relatively short, well–written, and illustrates a pretty dramatic reversal, 180 degrees in 17 years, of what most folks thought was settled law. It also contains an interesting discussion of laws dealing with private conduct dating back to English common law centuries ago.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]