Jury Awards Waterbury Woman $146,001 Following Car Crash; Motion to Set Aside Verdict Filed
A Superior Court jury awarded Ana Maria Capeles $146,001 on Aug. 3 following a car collision in a Waterbury parking lot. Capeles suffered neck and back pain, and the neck injuries are permanent.
August 14, 2018 at 12:54 PM
4 minute read
A Waterbury Superior Court jury has awarded $146,001 to a 33-year-old woman who suffered permanent neck injuries after the vehicle she was driving in was struck by another vehicle in a 7/11 convenience store parking lot.
Ana Maria Capeles and her 16-year-old son Orland were injured in Waterbury in February 2015 after a car driven by Roland Ouellette “suddenly and without warning reversed and collided” with Capeles' vehicle, as Ouellette attempted to leave a parking spot, according to a lawsuit filed in January 2017.
The collision, according to Capeles' attorney, Erica Pilicy-Ryan, caused serious injuries to Capeles' neck and lower back. Her son, who was sitting in the back seat, had back pain that has since resolved, according to Pilicy-Ryan, an associate with The Flood Law Firm in Middletown.
“Mr. Ouellette was not paying attention to where he was going,” Pilicy-Ryan said. “He asked my client to not call police so he could go to work. They did exchange information.” Since the police were never called, Ouellette was not cited for the accident, Pilicy-Ryan said.
Capeles, a Waterbury resident, drove herself to the hospital after the accident, and tests showed she had soft-tissue injuries to her neck and lower back, Pilicy-Ryan said.
“The neck had radiating pain going down her left arm, and the lower back had a strained sprain that had radiated down her legs,” the attorney said. “That pain has since subsided.”
The neck pain, though, Pilicy-Ryan said, is permanent. Experts who spoke during the three-day trial agreed that Capeles had permanent neck pain, but differed on how severe it is. “Our expert said there was a 14 percent permanent partial impairment rating, while their expert said it was 6 percent,” Pilicy-Ryan said.
The six-person jury heard from Capeles during the trial, which concluded Aug. 3 with a jury award of $138,155 for noneconomic damages and $7,846 for medical expenses for a total award of $146,001. The jury deliberated for about an hour.
“My client was terrified to go to trial,” Pilicy-Ryan told the Connecticut Law Tribune. “She was very nervous on the stand. Maybe it was because she could only speak Spanish and there was a language barrier. She did have interpreters through the whole trial.”
Pilicy-Ryan continued: “Her nervousness was something I had to address in my closing arguments. That was my time to speak on her behalf. I told the jury how upset she was by this whole experience and how much pain she was in. She had a lot of pain and it's everyday.”
Also speaking during trial was Dr. Jennifer Gonzales-Colon, the treating chiropractor. “She testified that her injuries were caused by the accident. She was very credible and believable,” Pilicy-Ryan said.
Capeles' injuries did not require surgery. An MRI showed disc bulges and Capeles was offered injections, but declined them, her attorney said. Pilicy-Ryan said Capeles will continue her chiropractic care.
The defense, headed by Matthew DeAngelis of Meehan, Roberts, Turret & Rosenbaum in Glastonbury, filed a motion to set aside the jury verdict and have a new trial on Aug. 10.
In court papers, the defense maintained the “court [Judge Andrew Roraback] erred in admitting evidence of liability insurance. Evidence that a defendant carries liability insurance is inadmissible on the issue of the defendant's negligence.” DeAngelis did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
Before trial, plaintiff's side was willing to settle the case for $35,000, but the defense would not go higher than $14,000, Pilicy-Ryan said.
No award will be disbursed until the legal proceedings run their course.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllT14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
Wrongful-Death Case Against Adult Day Care Sparks Call for State Regulation
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250