The ongoing trial of Paul Manafort in federal court in Virginia for bank fraud and tax evasion is providing a stark example of a federal judge abusing his courtroom authority to the extent he may be jeopardizing the prosecution’s ability to get a conviction, which the evidence suggests it should win. U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis has been described in press coverage of the trial as presiding as an “activist judge”; in this case that is a euphemism for a bully in a black robe.

He has described himself as “Caesar in my own Rome,” and his bizarre behavior, thus far directed almost exclusively at the federal prosecutors, suggests he truly believes that self-description.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]