'The Dogs Wanted to Kill': Former FedEx Worker Gets $160,000 Settlement After Attack
While delivering a package. FedEx Ground driver Russell Horvath was attacked by two dogs. He suffered serious injuries and settled his case for $160,000.
August 23, 2018 at 05:50 PM
4 minute read
A former FedEx Ground driver, attacked by two pit bulls that jumped into his truck as he attempted to deliver a package, has a settled his lawsuit for $160,000.
The dogs went on the attack and wanted to kill Russell Horvath, according to Horvath's attorney, Ryan Miller.
“He reacted quickly, as most people are not getting out of that situation alive,” said Miller, a partner with Stratford's Rosenberg, Miller, Hite & Morilla. “The dogs wanted to kill.”
Miller said Horvath backed his truck into the driveway of a Thomaston home in July 2013 when he saw one of the pit bulls snarling at him. Soon after, Miller said, the pit bull jumped onto the vehicle. “At this point, he put the package between himself and the dog to protect himself when, out of nowhere, he looks behind him and sees another pit bull.”
One dog bit Horvath in the buttocks while the other bit his right knee and forearm, Miller said. Horvath was able to get the dogs away by kicking one and slamming a sliding door on the other, said Miller, who noted the attacks lasted about two minutes. A lawsuit was filed against the dogs' owners, siblings Jacob and Esther Radulewicz, and their father Thomas Radulewicz, in Litchfield Superior Court in July 2015. It's believed, Miller said, that both dogs were put down.
Miller said Horvath, 58, was bleeding from the buttocks, right knee and forearm when he drove himself to the hospital immediately following the attacks. The bites were so deep, Miller said, that hospital personnel decided against giving him stitches. Instead, Miller said, they irrigated Horvath's wounds.
The case settled Aug. 7, Miller said. Horvath will receive $160,000, which includes $120,000 in settlement funds and $40,000 in workers' compensation, since the incident occurred when he was on the job.
Several attempts at mediation went nowhere, Miller said. The attorney said one bone of contention was the defense's argument that a subsequent injury to Horvath was not associated with the dog bites. That, Miller said, occurred on Horvath's first day back on the job after doctors ordered him not to work for one week.
“He went on a delivery route to a junkyard and he was injured as he tried to pick up a fairly heavy box,” Miller told the Connecticut Law Tribune Thursday. “His wounds on the right forearm began to burst open. He also felt a severe pain in his left shoulder.” A surgeon, Miller said, testified at deposition that the incident at the junkyard was directly related to the dog bites. Horvath ended up having surgery on his left shoulder, his attorney said.
“My biggest obstacle was in advocating the entire way that the shoulder injury was related to the dog bites,” Miller said.
The two sides, Miller said, were far apart for months. The attorney for the dog owners' insurance carrier, Hanover Insurance, wanted to settle for just $10,000. Miller said his initial demand was for $250,000.
Hanover Insurance was represented by Garrett O'Keefe of Glastonbury-based Connelly & Johnson. O'Keefe did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.
In court papers, the defense argued that it was up to Horvath's lawyers to prove their case. They said the plaintiff attorneys needed to prove that Horvath was not tormenting the dog; that the defendants were liable for the injuries; and the extent of Horvath's injuries.
Today, Miller said, his client has some permanent scarring on his forearm and arm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPike Fuels Agrees to Pay $2 Million Settlement to Resolve Alleged New Haven Environmental Violations
2 minute readMajor Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250