Family Separations Are Too Much To Bear
Sometimes there is an event, initiative, court decision that is monumental in its effect but almost too much to put into words. What is going on with…
August 30, 2018 at 05:02 PM
3 minute read
Sometimes there is an event, initiative, court decision that is monumental in its effect but almost too much to put into words. What is going on with immigrant families in this country right now fits this definition. Even if the practice of separating immigrant parents from their children has stopped—and it is not clear that it has, at least not entirely—there apparently remain more than two thousand children who have been taken from their parents and whose return appears difficult to accomplish. Even a court order for their return appears to be largely ineffectual.
This is a problem entirely of the administration's making. Nothing compelled this forced separation of parents and children and it does not appear that it happened in this way in the past. So the presidential decree that it stop is hardly either a heroic or a sufficient act. It is a problem created by the people who now declare that it should stop. And certainly, it should stop. And every child taken away must be returned immediately. This is no time for procedural delay. The children must be returned right now, with no delay.
There may be no resources for housing, feeding, and caring for the families. That also has to be solved. This is not a situation that happened overnight. It was apparent that it was going to happen. This country has agencies that deal with emergencies. This is the time for them to act. And not every parent and family needs to be kept pending the resolution of their case. Electronic monitoring is used on people charged with much more serious crimes than entering this country. There is no reason it cannot be used now. Families with relatives in this country who are ready and willing to take them in now should be allowed to do so.
That is the cure, at least for now. But what is the damage? Incalculable. In a matter of a few weeks, this country has created a group of children and families who are traumatized, and they are, for the most part, people who only came here because they had suffered harm and danger in their countries of origin. Child psychologists have become a chorus of warning, telling how the forced, brutal separation of children from their parents will have a lasting effect on those children. Have we created a population of permanently injured children who may become the terrorists or gang members of the future? Have we turned America, the land of hope, into America, the land of torture? Is this who we are?
We applaud the many attorneys and others who are working tirelessly to right these many wrongs, and we support their efforts. But we have to step back and look at what is going on in this country and ask how we can possibly not act to put things right.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllADVANCE Act Offers Conn. Opportunity to Enhance Carbon-Free Energy and Improve Reliability With Advanced Nuclear Technologies
Trending Stories
- 1Snap Paid $63M in Fees to 2 Am Law 200 Firms in '24
- 2Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism
- 3Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America
- 4Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing As Sanctions Take Their Toll
- 5Government Contracting Clients Look to Firms to Stay on Top of Trump Policy Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250