Report Shows ESPN Sportscaster Chris Berman's Wife Was Drunk on Afternoon of Fatal Crash. Now Plaintiff Targets Berman Estate
The family of Edward Bertulis is going after both the estate of Katherine Berman and the eatery that allegedly sold her drinks. Bertulis was killed after his car was struck by Berman's in Woodbury. Berman was the wife of ESPN sportscaster Chris Berman.
September 04, 2018 at 02:14 PM
4 minute read
Experts in driving under the influence law say the family pursuing legal action against the estate of Katherine Berman following a car crash in which Berman and one other motorist were killed now have a huge chance of winning the case with the release of a police report showing Berman was more than three times the legal limit at the time of the May 2017 accident. Katherine Berman was the wife of famed ESPN sportscaster Chris Berman.
“It makes the case easier for the plaintiffs lawyer to make a claim that she was reckless in her behavior,” said attorney Jay Ruane, who specializes in DUI law.
Ruane, of Ruane Attorneys At Law, told the Connecticut Law Tribune Tuesday that “in most situations, an insurance company who insured her will not want to say she was not under the influence given these facts that we suspect are true. In this type of situation, the lawyer can [probably] rely on the insurance company tendering the full policy.” Ruane, who is not involved in the case, added that while going after the estate is one thing, winning a suit against the eatery that served Berman is another thing. The family of Edward Bertulis has filed suit against Woodbury-based Market Place Kitchen & Bar under the Dram Shop Act.
The act make a business which sells alcoholic beverages to someone who is obviously intoxicated, or close to it, liable to anyone later injured or killed by that drunken patron.
“It's harder to prove the case against the establishment,” Ruane said. “You have to show the bartender was serving someone they knew to be intoxicated and abrogated their duty. Unfortunately, many people do not necessarily present all the signs of being intoxicated when they are in a social setting.”
The 250-page police report, which was released last week, showed the blood alcohol level of Berman was 0.26. The legal limit in Connecticut is 0.08. In addition, the report states, Berman's Lexus SC430 was traveling about 82 miles per hour. The speed limit at the Woodbury location where the crash occurred was 45 miles per hour. The police report also states there was no alcohol or drugs present in the blood stream of Bertulis, whose car Berman struck. According to a lawsuit filed against the restaurant, Berman “suddenly and without warning slammed into the rear end of Mr. Bertulis with such force that the impact caused Mr. Bertulis to be ejected from the vehicle and suffer severe injuries which later resulted in his death.”
New Milford attorney Philip Spillane, who is representing the Bertulis estate, said he is pursuing all legal avenues, but added, “we hope we will be successful in resolving without litigation.” Spillane, of Hoekenga & Machado, said he has been and will continue to keep in contact with Theresa Nehez, a senior claim director for Chubb Insurance in New Haven. Chubb is the carrier for the Berman auto liability policy. Spillane and Nehez both declined to say how much the Berman policy is for. Spillane declined to say how much money he was seeking for the Bertulis family.
“I will be having preliminary discussions with the insurance carrier the next few weeks in an effort to resolve without litigation,” Spillane said.
Spillane said he's received calls from media outlets throughout the state and even one in New York City. “The Bertulis family would like their privacy to be respected during this time,” Spillane said. “They have received some [media] calls and are referring them to me.”
The Connecticut Law Tribune reached out Tuesday to Nehez, Chris Berman, Woodbury attorney David Sfara, restaurant owner Elias Hawli and Francis Paola of the Hartford-based Law Offices of Rodd Mantell. Paola represents Hawli and Sfara handles probate matters for the Berman estate. Nehez and Sfara declined to comment Tuesday. Berman, Hawli and Paola did not respond to requests for comment.
Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readPlaintiffs Seek to Avoid Jurisdiction Fight in IVF Case, Challenge CooperSurgical in Connecticut
4 minute readPike Fuels Agrees to Pay $2 Million Settlement to Resolve Alleged New Haven Environmental Violations
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250