Professionalism Boot Camp: An Idea Whose Time Has Come
Most law degree curricula now include robust clinical programs, internships, trial practice courses and similar programs designed to expose the law student to the realities of the legal profession he or she will soon enter.
September 06, 2018 at 04:53 PM
3 minute read
Law schools are often criticized for spending too much time and effort teaching their students the law and not nearly enough teaching them the practice of law, with the result that new admittees to the bar are woefully ill-prepared to undertake their new duties as officers of the court and practicing attorneys.
That censure appears far less justified today than it was in the past, for most law degree curricula now include robust clinical programs, internships, trial practice courses and similar programs designed to expose the law student to the realities of the legal profession he or she will soon enter. But the primary focus of the law school must remain, of course, on legal doctrine, and there is a limit to how much of the available time can be carved out and devoted to the practical programs. Accordingly, the law school graduate necessarily comes to her new profession with much to learn.
The law firm, legal aid office or state agency employing the new admittee will typically have in place a training program of varying formality to help the rookie lawyer with the steep learning curve she will be confronting. Bar groups will also focus on this problem with the CLE programs they offer. Indeed, the Young Lawyer Section of the Connecticut Bar Association has for many years presented its highly regarded and very successful “Nuts and Bolts” program, designed to teach new lawyers the fundamentals of various areas of private practice. Now there will be a program applying that same concept to the professionalism issues the first-year lawyer will be facing, with the hope of filling a void in law school and post-admission training.
This November, the CBA's Standing Committee on Professionalism and CLE will present its first “Professionalism Boot Camp” for new and relatively new lawyers, which is designed to help them “master the skills needed to practice more professionally and ethically.” The half-day format will start with a plenary session presented by the Statewide Bar Counsel or a former chief disciplinary counsel, with the objective of teaching the attendees how to avoid a grievance, a topic of paramount importance to them, of course. That will be followed by breakout sessions on the use of technology in the practice; insurance requirements; the structure, organization and operation of large law firms; client intake and billing; networking and rainmaking; and the unseen perils of social media.
All the topics will be presented from the perspective of the ethical and professional framework in which the lawyer must operate, with the objective of inculcating in the nascent attorney a regard for maintaining the highest level of professionalism and civility from the very start of her career. In the process, the new recruits will learn the unwritten rules of the practice, which cannot be found in the Practice Book or anywhere else, but which are so necessary to a successful and rewarding career.
The mission of the CBA Standing Committee on Professionalism and CLE is to enhance the level of professionalism among lawyers and judges and to promote their commitment to the CBA's Lawyer's Principles of Professionalism. The professionalism boot camp it has conceived will constitute a giant step toward meeting that objective, with obvious benefit to both those lawyers and our profession. Kudos to the Committee.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllADVANCE Act Offers Conn. Opportunity to Enhance Carbon-Free Energy and Improve Reliability With Advanced Nuclear Technologies
Trending Stories
- 1Immigration Under the Trump Administration: Five Things to Expect in the First 90 Days
- 2'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
- 3NY District Attorneys Are Still No Fans of Revamped Misconduct Watchdog
- 4ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Israel's Prime Minister Over Alleged War Crimes in Gaza
- 5Attorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250