From the Stage to the Bench: Judge James Abrams Talks Acting and Transitioning Back to the Courtroom
Superior Court Judge James Abrams talks in-depth with the Connecticut Law Tribune about acting and life before the law, and life as a judge and in a supervisory role.
September 11, 2018 at 05:24 PM
5 minute read
Editor's note: This profile of Superior Court Judge James Abrams is the eighth in a series of interviews with judges and recently retired jurists.
While many future attorneys graduate law school at about age 25, James Abrams had other thoughts.
The son of a graphic artist and librarian, Abrams' parents never pushed him into any profession. They only encouraged him to do what he wanted. And, early on, Abrams said, that entailed being a stage actor.
Abrams took up acting at Hamden High School and then again at Trinity College in Hartford. He joined the National Theater Institute in Waterford in 1977 and after graduating Trinity in 1978, headed west to try acting in Seattle. His biggest role was playing Dr. Watson in a “Sherlock Holmes” play.
“I enjoyed it, but I was not good enough,” Abrams lamented.
Still not envisioning being a lawyer, Abrams entered the world of special education, where he worked from 1980-1987 in several New Haven-based residential facilities. It's also where he met his wife Mary Abrams.
After pondering what his next step would be, James Abrams, who said he was “always intrigued by the law,” decided to take night courses at the University of Connecticut School of Law, where he graduated with honors at age 32.
Abrams was an attorney from 1988-2006, most of that time as a solo practitioner with a concentration on civil litigation, probate, commercial law and real estate. He also served from 1995-2005 as a Democrat in the State Legislature representing Meriden and surrounding areas.
It was the role of a lifetime in 2007 when then Gov. Jodi Rell appointed Abrams Superior Court judge. While he enjoyed his time as an attorney, the 62-year-old Meriden resident said he is better equipped to be a judge.
“I think I am more suited, personally, to be a judge than a lawyer,” Abrams told the Connecticut Law Tribune on Tuesday. “As a lawyer, I was always looking to resolve a case at the earliest possible juncture and to the least cost to my client. I was solution-oriented, not adversarial. Some people want lawyers who are very adversarial, and that is just not my style.”
Coming to an agreement and settling cases is what Abrams most likes about being a judge. For the last six years—two spent in New Britain and four in New Haven—Abrams has enjoyed his role as presiding judge for civil matters. Although he spent some time in the courtroom, he was largely settling disputes and cases.
“I found the work rewarding,” Abrams said. “Settling cases is a tangible result. I go into work and, if I settle three cases that day, on the way home I say to myself, 'I've done my job. I'm lucky to have a job where you can have tangible results. It's not every day, but it is a lot of days.”
While many of the cases he presided over dealt with collections and foreclosures, 75 percent of them were personal-injury related. “The ones where my mediation skills came into play were the personal injury ones,” he said. “Most of those cases settled before they got to verdict.”
Abrams became chief administrative judge for civil matters statewide in November and he added a new job title on Sept. 4. He became administrative judge for the New Haven judicial district. That means Abrams will be back in the courtroom on a fairly regular basis. It is where he excels, many who know and have worked with Abrams say.
“He is a fantastic judge because he knows how to balance levity with seriousness,” said Angela Robinson, a former Superior Court judge and current attorney for Wiggin and Dana.
Robinson, who has known Abrams for about 10 years and was his immediate predecessor as administrative judge, added, “I think being in the Legislature gives him a better understanding of the policies behind the law, in addition to just the words of the law.”
Abrams is vice chairperson of the Judicial Law Library Advisory Committee and co-facilitator of sexual harassment and diversity programs for newly appointed judges. He and his wife have been married 33 years. They have two children and one granddaughter.
Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConnecticut Movers: New Hires at SkiberLaw, Verrill and Silver Golub & Teitell
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1GE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
- 2As Political Extremism Rises, is Voter Data the Next Privacy Frontier?
- 3So You Want to be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
- 4US District Judge in North Carolina Will Take Senior Status
- 5From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250