Conn. Supreme Court Upholds Workers' Comp Award in Asbestos-Related Cancer Case
The high court has ruled unanimously that the family of Donald Filosi Jr., a former Electric Boat employee who died of lung cancer six years ago, is entitled to workers' compensation benefits. The next step is to determine how much in weekly benefits the family will receive.
September 25, 2018 at 12:40 PM
3 minute read
The Connecticut Supreme Court has affirmed the ruling of the Compensation Review Board awarding workers' compensation benefits to a former longtime Electric Boat employee who died of lung cancer in 2012.
Originally, the Workers' Compensation Commissioner for the Eighth District ruled against the estate of Donald Filosi Jr., and in favor of Electric Boat, a company that designs and builds nuclear submarines.
But that ruling was appealed by the family and the review board reversed the commissioner's ruling.
In a 5-0 ruling on Sept. 18 by the Connecticut Supreme Court, Chief Justice Richard Robinson wrote: “The plaintiffs contend that the record in the present case demonstrates that the administrative law judge relied on the plaintiff's medical experts and found that asbestos exposure was a substantial factor contributing to the decedent's lung cancer. We agree with the plaintiff.”
The case is now remanded back to the Workers' Compensation Commissioner, where it will be determined how much in weekly benefits the family was entitled to over the course of their lifetime, and for how long.
The family had already secured compensation under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. Katherine Filosi, Donald Filosi's wife, then sought to collect workers' compensation. Katherine Filosi died of lung cancer herself during the appeal. The couple's son, Daniel, was named executor of the estate after his mother died.
“This is a fantastic win. We are very happy and Daniel is very happy,” said Amity Arscott, the Groton-based attorney for the family. “I think the message here is that Electric Boat made a business decision to continue using asbestos when they knew it was harmful.” Today, Arscott, an attorney with Embry & Neusner, said the industry in general uses asbestos on a limited basis.
Donald Filosi was a smoker and Electric Boat had argued that the asbestos on its premises was not a contributing factor in him contacting lung cancer and subsequently dying from it. According the Connecticut Supreme Court's ruling, Filosi was a heavy smoker of cigarettes from age 14 until his death at age 69. He did stop smoking periodically, the court said.
At a hearing on the LHWCA claims, Dr. Laura Welch, who is board certified in internal medicine and occupational medicine, testified that “smoking contributed to [the decedent's] lung cancer, but his asbestos exposure was a substantial contributing cause.”
Filosi worked as a rigger in Electric Boat's shipyard from 1961 through 1998, when he retired. According to court papers filed on behalf of the family, Filosi moved heavy machinery and equipment on and off of submarines. His job, the court papers said, required the dumping of 55-gallon barrels of asbestos-containing refuse from the submarines. The Groton-based company is on a submarine base.
Arscott said she is hoping to get on the workers' compensation asbestos docket within the month. “They are quite diligent in getting things scheduled,” she said.
Electric Boat was represented by Peter Quay of the Norwich-based Law Office of Peter D. Quay. Quay did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday. In addition, Electric Boat's public affairs department declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250