Connecticut to Get $4.5M of Uber's $148M Settlement With States Over Data Breach
Uber has agreed to a $148 million settlement over a delayed data breach involving its drivers. The agreement is with the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
September 26, 2018 at 02:56 PM
3 minute read
The popular ride-hailing company Uber reached a $148 million settlement Wednesday afternoon with the 50 states and the District of Columbia for failing to quickly notify drivers that hackers had stolen their personal data, including driver's license information.
Uber, according to a press release by the office of Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen, learned that hackers had gained access to the information in 2016. While the company obtained assurances that the hackers deleted the information, Uber failed to report the breach to law enforcement or the affected drivers until November 2017, the press release says. The hacking affected about 600,000 drivers nationwide.
All 50 states and the District of Columbia reached the agreement with the San Francisco-based company. Under the settlement agreement, Connecticut's share of the funds is $4.5 million. Of that amount, $400,000 will be deposited into the state's Attorney General's Consumer Protection Fund to support the office's consumer protection work, and $250,000 will go into the state Department of Consumer Protection's consumer protection enforcement fund.
Some of the remaining funds will provide each eligible Connecticut Uber driver with a $100 payment. Eligible drivers are those whose driver's license numbers were accessed during the 2016 breach. About 3,549 drivers in the state were affected, the release said.
“Companies in possession of personal information have a responsibility under Connecticut law to keep that information safe,” Jepsen said in a statement. “When that data is exposed, they have a responsibility to report it within a time period prescribed by law, which Uber clearly and plainly did not do.”
Uber is represented by Adam Schuman and Rebecca Engrav, both with Perkins Coie. Engrav referred all comment to Uber's press department, which in turn pointed journalists to its website, where Uber's Chief Legal Officer Tony West post a detailed statement.
“Our current management team's decision to disclose the incident was not only the right thing to do, it embodies the principles by which we are running our business today: transparency, integrity, and accountability,” the company's statement read. “An important component of living up to those principles means taking responsibility for past mistakes, learning from them, and moving forward.”
The statement continues: “So I'm pleased that we've reached an agreement with the attorneys general of all 50 states and the District of Columbia to resolve their legal inquiries on this matter. The commitments we're making in this agreement are in line with our focus on both physical and digital safety for our customers… We know that earning the trust of our customers and the regulators we work with globally is no easy feat. After all, trust is hard to gain and easy to lose. We'll continue to invest in protections to keep our customers and their data safe and secure, and we're committed to maintaining a constructive and collaborative relationship with governments around the world.”
In addition to the financial settlement, Uber will be required to, among other things, comply with Connecticut's data breach and consumer protection laws and employ strong password policies for employee access on its network.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClass Action Lawsuit Targets 40 Private Colleges and Universities Over Alleged Price-Fixing
3 minute readMeet Phrances Szewczyk, a Family Law Attorney Running for Middletown Judge
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250