Connecticut to Get $4.5M of Uber's $148M Settlement With States Over Data Breach
Uber has agreed to a $148 million settlement over a delayed data breach involving its drivers. The agreement is with the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
September 26, 2018 at 02:56 PM
3 minute read
The popular ride-hailing company Uber reached a $148 million settlement Wednesday afternoon with the 50 states and the District of Columbia for failing to quickly notify drivers that hackers had stolen their personal data, including driver's license information.
Uber, according to a press release by the office of Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen, learned that hackers had gained access to the information in 2016. While the company obtained assurances that the hackers deleted the information, Uber failed to report the breach to law enforcement or the affected drivers until November 2017, the press release says. The hacking affected about 600,000 drivers nationwide.
All 50 states and the District of Columbia reached the agreement with the San Francisco-based company. Under the settlement agreement, Connecticut's share of the funds is $4.5 million. Of that amount, $400,000 will be deposited into the state's Attorney General's Consumer Protection Fund to support the office's consumer protection work, and $250,000 will go into the state Department of Consumer Protection's consumer protection enforcement fund.
Some of the remaining funds will provide each eligible Connecticut Uber driver with a $100 payment. Eligible drivers are those whose driver's license numbers were accessed during the 2016 breach. About 3,549 drivers in the state were affected, the release said.
“Companies in possession of personal information have a responsibility under Connecticut law to keep that information safe,” Jepsen said in a statement. “When that data is exposed, they have a responsibility to report it within a time period prescribed by law, which Uber clearly and plainly did not do.”
Uber is represented by Adam Schuman and Rebecca Engrav, both with Perkins Coie. Engrav referred all comment to Uber's press department, which in turn pointed journalists to its website, where Uber's Chief Legal Officer Tony West post a detailed statement.
“Our current management team's decision to disclose the incident was not only the right thing to do, it embodies the principles by which we are running our business today: transparency, integrity, and accountability,” the company's statement read. “An important component of living up to those principles means taking responsibility for past mistakes, learning from them, and moving forward.”
The statement continues: “So I'm pleased that we've reached an agreement with the attorneys general of all 50 states and the District of Columbia to resolve their legal inquiries on this matter. The commitments we're making in this agreement are in line with our focus on both physical and digital safety for our customers… We know that earning the trust of our customers and the regulators we work with globally is no easy feat. After all, trust is hard to gain and easy to lose. We'll continue to invest in protections to keep our customers and their data safe and secure, and we're committed to maintaining a constructive and collaborative relationship with governments around the world.”
In addition to the financial settlement, Uber will be required to, among other things, comply with Connecticut's data breach and consumer protection laws and employ strong password policies for employee access on its network.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew York-Based Harris Beach Combines With Connecticut-Based Murtha Cullina, Forming NE Powerhouse
3 minute readConn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250