Judge Sheldon Talks About His Relationship With Russia's Legal Community
Connecticut Appellate Court Judge Michael Sheldon has been an advocate for American and Russian lawyers and judges working together.
October 03, 2018 at 03:07 PM
4 minute read
Editor's note: This profile of Connecticut Appellate Court Judge Michael Sheldon is the ninth in a series of interviews with judges and recently retired jurists.
Growing up in Schenectady, New York, in the 1960s, the last thing Michael Sheldon wanted to become was a lawyer—let alone a judge.
Sheldon, who today sits on the Connecticut Appellate Court, was interested in a lot of things growing up. Those interests included getting directly involved in the protests of the day, such as fighting apartheid in South Africa, fighting for women's rights or for civil rights. Sheldon, now 69 years old, also had an interest in political science, and had dreamed of being an astrophysicist.
Sheldon also had a fascination with Russia and its people, especially since it was the height of the Cold War. He studied Russian in high school and then again at Princeton University, where his specialty was Russian studies and international affairs.
“I studied the language early on and I was pretty good at it,” Sheldon said.
Sheldon later won a grant to study in a summer program in the Soviet Union through the University of Michigan. He would spent 30 days there at age 20. He fell in love with the country and devoted his life to traveling there. Most notably, he went there as vice chairman of the Connecticut-Pskov Rule of Law Project, a partnership of sorts with lawyers and judges in Pskov, a city in western Russia, near the boarder with Estonia, a 12-hour train ride from Moscow. He held the role of vice chairman from 2003-2013, when money for the trips ran out.
“I thought a wonderful thing to do in my life would be to humanize the face of Russia for Americans,” he said.
Sheldon was a law professor at the University of Connecticut from 1976 until he was named to the Connecticut Superior Court in 1991. He was promoted to the Connecticut Appellate Court in 2011.
Through it all, Sheldon kept a connection with the country. In 1979, he spent three weeks there meeting with the country's top judges, lawyers and legal minds.
“We saw many Russian courts and plenty of attractions,” he said. “It was an opportunity to meet with Russians who were, in essence, our colleagues and in positions comparable to our own.”
Those relationships forged in the 1970s, '80s and '90s, remain today, Sheldon said.
From 1990 through 2000, Sheldon also helped run an exchange program between the school system in Canton and a section of Moscow. It was a student/teacher exchange, and Canton students went to Russia every year of the program. Meanwhile, Sheldon had Russian visitors staying in his home.
The pinnacle of his Russian experience came in 2003 when Sheldon was named vice chairman of the Connecticut-Pskov Rule of Law Project. In that role, Sheldon organized and participated in teaching at annual educational seminars for Russian judges, prosecutors and defense lawyers.
“They were approaching the process of starting jury trials and updating their system of justice,” Sheldon noted. “They were experimenting with things like plea bargaining. We learned from each other.”
The chairman of the law project was now-retired Judge Jonathan Silbert. Silbert was Sheldon's professor at Yale Law School in 1974.
“Most teachers have this feeling that, at one point in their life, there will be that one person who is at least 10 times smarter than I am. Michael was that person. He is brilliant, has a photographic memory and is a joy to be around.” The two remained closed friends and decided to start the law project together.
Even though the money for the trips ran out and the law project disbanded several years ago, the trips to Russia continue, as do the friendships.
Sheldon was last in Russia in 2016 and plans on returning next year.
“Jonathan and I will be traveling there to make sure that our friends understand that, regardless of what is going on politically with the two countries, that the underlying friendships formed were real and substantial and are continuing.”
Related Stories:
From the Stage to the Bench: Judge James Abrams Talks Acting and Transitioning Back to the Courtroom
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Conversation with NLJ Lifetime Achievement Award Winner Jeh Johnson
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Operations at a Crossroads: How Corporate Legal Teams Will Continue to Drive Innovation and Implement Digital Transformation in 2025
- 2Court Leaders Given Authority to Expand E-Filing Under Newly-Signed Bill
- 3Fulton Jury Returns Defense Verdict After Pedestrian Killed By MARTA Bus
- 4Could Everything Be Alright Without Me Knowing? The State of Professionalism Among Attorneys
- 5Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond in the Rough
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250