This Connecticut Attorney Stole $169,000 From Clients Under the Court's Protection
Former Bristol attorney and councilwoman Jodi Zils Gagne pleaded guilty Wednesday to one count of mail fraud in connection to a scheme to defraud several individuals she had represented as a court-appointed conservator.
October 11, 2018 at 12:07 PM
4 minute read
A former Bristol attorney pleaded guilty Wednesday to one count of mail fraud related to the theft of $169,000 from clients while she served as a court-appointed conservator.
Conservators are appointed by the probate court to oversee the financial or personal affairs of adults incapable of managing their finances or personal care. But according to the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut, an officer of the court used the position to help herself to the wards' assets.
Prosecutors said 43-year-old Jodi Zils Gagne defrauded several people under the court's protection, including an impaired client older than 90 and another who had multiple sclerosis, by misappropriating their money and overbilling them.
Zils Gagne, also a former Bristol councilwoman who served until losing her seat in November 2017, misappropriated money that was intended for her clients' medical care, housing, bills and personal expenses, according to the government.
In one case, Zils Gagne defrauded a victim of about $130,000, prosecutors said. She took $113,000 of that money under the guise of an investment when, in fact, it was a 10-year note that paid only a prime rate and was signed between her husband and her, as the victim's conservator. The money, authorities said, was used to fund her husband's startup internet radio station in Bristol.
Zils Gagne also misrepresented, or failed to disclose, material facts about her conservatorship activities to the Bristol probate court and others, the government said. The illegal activity, authorities said, occurred between May 2015 and February 2018.
The government said in court papers that Zils Gagne, in her role as conservator, fraudulently obtained and converted money and property from her victims through, among other means, commingling the victims' money with each other and her husband's business and personal funds. They say she misappropriated her victims' money for her own personal use and enrichment, overbilled for conservator fees, and made materially false and fraudulent representations and omissions to the Bristol probate court and to at least one successor conservator concerning the use and expenditure of the victims' money.
Zils Gagne now faces a maximum prison term of 20 years and a $250,000 fine. She was released Wednesday on a $50,000 bond pending sentencing on Jan. 23.
Her law license is also in jeopardy. At the request of the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel, a Superior Court judge suspended her from practicing law for five years. The attorney was also ordered to pay $108,000 in restitution.
Zils Gagne has been an attorney for about 16 years and most recently worked as a solo practitioner. If she satisfactorily completes 10 hours of continuing legal education, as approved by the Connecticut Bar Association, she could apply for readmission after one year.
The judge's order in Zils Gagne's disciplinary case calls for her to be supervised by an attorney in good standing during her suspension. It also allows for periodic random audits.
Zils Gagne's attorney, Francis O'Reilly of Southport-based O'Reilly & Shaw Law Offices, did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.
The matter was investigated by the FBI and the Greenwich Police Department with the assistance of the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel and the New Britain State's Attorneys Office. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney David Huang. Tom Carson, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney, declined to offer further comment Thursday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250