Student's Refusal to Stand for Pledge of Allegiance Leads to Federal Lawsuit
A federal lawsuit has been filed on behalf of a 15-year-old sophomore at a Waterbury school, who says she was mocked and shamed by her teacher because she did not stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. The lawsuit seeks to have the teacher pay punitive damages,
October 17, 2018 at 12:27 PM
3 minute read
A 15-year-old sophomore at the Waterbury Arts Magnet School claims in a First Amendment lawsuit that her teacher mocked and shamed her when she would not stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.
In the federal lawsuit filed Monday in U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut in Bridgeport, the girl, identified as N.F., also said Italian language teacher Ralph Belvedere falsely accused her of not doing her classwork and, on one occasion, brought another teacher in the classroom to lecture students who had not stood for the pledge on their supposed lack of patriotism.
The complaint says the four nonwhite students in the class did not stand as a “silent expression of their beliefs” while all the white students stood.
There were several incidents of not standing for the pledge, including the last one on Oct. 3, in which the lawsuit alleges Belvedere made the girl, who is black, feel “frightened and intimidated.” The suit seeks to have Belvedere pay punitive damages and to “deter him and others similarly situated from infringing the peaceful exercise of First Amendment rights by the plaintiff and other students in the future.”
John Williams, attorney for the girl and her mother Gina Humber, told the Connecticut Law Tribune Wednesday that Belvedere lost an opportunity to have a meaningful exchange with his class.
“The teacher could have done one of two things,” said Williams, a New Haven-based solo practitioner. “He could have simply ignored the students who did not stand, or he could have attempted to use it as a teaching moment to help all students on both sides of the so-called divide to appreciate and respect the views of others. Instead, he verbally mocked her.”
Williams said Humber, a school administrator in New York City, “is helping her daughter feel empowered and to stand up for her own beliefs in a respectful and appropriate way.”
“The girl found this whole experience intimidating, but her mom has given her a sense of self-worth and affirmation,” he said. “The girl is confident she did the right thing and she will not be bullied.”
Alan Neigher, a semi-retired attorney who has specialized in First Amendment issues for about five decades, said “nonviolent protests are generally protected speech.”
Neigher, who has an office in Westport, said Williams' primary obstacle is that he will have to show that the student's behavior was not disruptive to the class.
“If the name-calling is true, he will have to show that the school officials punished the students, that they singled them out, for their passive protests,” Neigher said.
The case will be heard in front of Judge Victor Bolden.
While Williams is seeking punitive damages from Belvedere, he is seeking just $1 in damages and attorney fees from the Waterbury Board of Education, which is also a defendant in the case.
“The law is pretty straightforward, and we are not looking to break the district or enrich my client or me,” he said.
Belvedere did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday, nor did Waterbury Board of Education President Elizabeth Brown or Vice President Karen Harvey.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew York-Based Harris Beach Combines With Connecticut-Based Murtha Cullina, Forming NE Powerhouse
3 minute readConn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 2Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 3Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 4Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
- 5Burr & Forman, Smith Gambrell & Russell Promote More to Partner This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250